On the public citation graph

On the Public Affairs Openness in Chinese Local Government: A Case Study in Guangzhou

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3266911
0 signed · 4 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.
Claim with ORCID
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.
See reference health

What this work says

Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2017.03.004openalex-extracted
The failure of an early episode in the open government data movement: A historical case study
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2017.05.009openalex-extracted
Liberation of public data: Exploring central themes in open government data and freedom of information research
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1109/mitp.2016.27openalex-extracted
A Framework for Information Security Governance and Management
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.4018/ijegr.2017010105openalex-extracted
The Latitude of Information Management in Local Government
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.