On the public citation graph
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3348347
0 signed · 34 inferred · view as graph
Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.
Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the
claims that are yours.
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a
known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped
badge you can embed.
What this work says
Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.290.3.360openalex-extracted
Problematic Variation in Local Institutional Review of a Multicenter Genetic Epidemiology Study
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470690642.app6openalex-extracted
Appendix 6: The Medicines for Human use (Marketing Authorisations etc.) Regulations 1994, SI No. 3144
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/eahr.500002openalex-extracted
Public Comments on the Proposed Common Rule Mandate for Single‐IRB Review of Multisite Research
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/eahr.500003openalex-extracted
Local Knowledge and Single IRBs for Multisite Studies: Challenges and Solutions
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-008-9322-4openalex-extracted
Gender Identity Politics, Human Subjects Issues, and the “Law of Unintended Consequences”
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-240-81291-5.00006-1openalex-extracted
Note from the Author
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s0035-8819(25)01632-0openalex-extracted
Ethical Review of a Multicentre Study in Scotland: A Weighty Problem
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s1096-2883(04)00113-5openalex-extracted
Copy id 10794-TGIE now available
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmp1005101openalex-extracted
The Paradoxical Problem with Multiple-IRB Review
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2017.1328530openalex-extracted
The sIRB System: A Single Beacon of Progress in the Revised Common Rule?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/17449480.2013.834747openalex-extracted
Understanding Regulation: Theory, Strategy, and Practice
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/23294515.2018.1510437openalex-extracted
Reliance agreements and single IRB review of multisite research: Concerns of IRB members and staff
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/cts.12447openalex-extracted
Final NIH Policy on the Use of a Single Institutional Review Board for Multisite Research
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00458.xopenalex-extracted
Impact of Institutional Review Board Practice Variation on Observational Health Services Research
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aad5269openalex-extracted
Ethics review for international data-intensive research
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.311.7006.639openalex-extracted
Local research ethics committees
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.329.7460.241openalex-extracted
Clinical research under the cosh again
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i4181openalex-extracted
Streamlining ethical review of data intensive research
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.26.5.334openalex-extracted
The case for a new system for oversight of research on human subjects
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2018-105107openalex-extracted
Reviewing code consistency is important, but research ethics committees must also make a judgement on scientific justification, methodological approach and competency of the research team
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/014107680009301004openalex-extracted
Costs of seeking ethics approval before and after the introduction of multicentre research ethics committees
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/014107689909201002openalex-extracted
Multicentre research ethics committees: have they helped?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243916677834openalex-extracted
Scandals, Ethics, and Regulatory Change in Biomedical Research
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/104973159300300406openalex-extracted
Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/1073110518766028openalex-extracted
Opening Closed Doors: Promoting IRB Transparency
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/1740774518807888openalex-extracted
The efficiency of single institutional review board review in National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Cooperative Reproductive Medicine Network–initiated clinical trials
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1525/jer.2011.6.1.3openalex-extracted
A Systematic Review of the Empirical Literature Evaluating IRBs: What We Know and What We Still Need to Learn
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2217/pme.15.52openalex-extracted
How Mutually Recognizable is Mutual Recognition? An International Terminology Index of Research Ethics Review Policies in the Usa, Canada, Uk and Australia
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412971942.n180openalex-extracted
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA)
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788975353openalex-extracted
Regulatory Stewardship of Health Research: Navigating Participant Protection and Research Promotion
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262027465.003.0015openalex-extracted
IRBs and the Problem of “Local Precedents”
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262028912.001.0001openalex-extracted
The Censor's Hand
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity
Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers
publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free
and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.