On the public citation graph

“To Be a Good Lawyer, One Has to Be a Healthy Lawyer”: Lawyer Well-Being, Discrimination, and Discretionary Systems of Discipline

0 signed · 15 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.

Claim with ORCID

Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.

See reference health

What this work says

Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-323-37829-1.12001-2openalex-extracted

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1097/adm.0000000000000182openalex-extracted

The Prevalence of Substance Use and Other Mental Health Concerns Among American Attorneys

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1097/adm.0000000000000226openalex-extracted

Statistics Failures Make Lawyer Addiction Estimates Worthless

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1097/adm.0000000000000227openalex-extracted

Author's Response to Statistics Failures Make Lawyer Addiction Estimates Worthless

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1159/000446936openalex-extracted

Erratum

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-4303507openalex-extracted

Communicating about Mental Illness and Violence: Balancing Stigma and Increased Support for Services

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3241530openalex-extracted

Rule 8.4(g) and the First Amendment: Distinguishing between Discrimination and Free Speech

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3320/978-1-931504-26-3.1openalex-extracted

Report of Microbial Growth Task Force

What points at this work

Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/hast.1336openalex-snapshot

Disability Affirmative Action Requirements for the U.S. HHS and Academic Medical Centers

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781009528535.002openalex-snapshot

Framing the Issue

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781009528535.005openalex-snapshot

The Hypocrisy of Attorney Licensing

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/10383441.2023.2260731openalex-snapshot

The case for implementing legal clinical supervision within legal practice, and recommendations for best practice

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18031036openalex-snapshot

Attitudes towards Risk Prediction in a Help Seeking Population of Early Detection Centers for Mental Disorders—A Qualitative Approach

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.56215/01211214openalex-snapshot

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.56215/01211214.74openalex-snapshot

Involvement of the Expert by the Defendant for an Examination during the Investigation of the Murder

Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.