On the public citation graph
Autonomous Systems in Ethical Dilemmas: Attitudes towards Randomization
0 signed · 39 inferred · view as graph
Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.
Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the
claims that are yours.
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a
known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped
badge you can embed.
What this work says
Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.1753openalex-extracted
Data Collection in a Flat World: The Strengths and Weaknesses of Mechanical Turk Samples
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1406-8_2openalex-extracted
The Effects of Financial Incentives in Experiments: A Review and Capital-Labor-Production Framework
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-021-03995-3openalex-extracted
Doctors’ shortage in adults COVID-19 units: a call for pediatricians
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10433-012-0247-3openalex-extracted
Values and adult age: findings from two cohorts of the European Social Survey
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-006-9159-4openalex-extracted
z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-018-0020-xopenalex-extracted
Human Decisions in Moral Dilemmas are Largely Described by Utilitarianism: Virtual Car Driving Study Provides Guidelines for Autonomous Driving Vehicles
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(91)90011-topenalex-extracted
Omission and commission in judgment and choice
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2020.103239openalex-extracted
Ethical approaches and autonomous systems
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2020.103349openalex-extracted
An approach for combining ethical principles with public opinion to guide public policy
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60281-6openalex-extracted
Universals in the Content and Structure of Values: Theoretical Advances and Empirical Tests in 20 Countries
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s1534-0856(06)08003-0openalex-extracted
Strategic Ignorance and Ethical Behavior in Organizations
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511576386openalex-extracted
On Philosophy in American Law
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511610332.016openalex-extracted
Conflicts of Interest and Strategic Ignorance of Harm
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/s0953820812000374openalex-extracted
Playing Dice with Morality: Weighted Lotteries and the Number Problem
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/h0031776openalex-extracted
Relationship between age and risk taking among managers.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0637-6openalex-extracted
The Moral Machine experiment
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-1987-4openalex-extracted
Life and death decisions of autonomous vehicles
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-49411-7openalex-extracted
Human decision-making biases in the moral dilemmas of autonomous vehicles
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmp2005689openalex-extracted
The Toughest Triage — Allocating Ventilators in a Pandemic
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/64.2.106openalex-extracted
The individualist lottery: how people count, but not their numbers
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1542-4774.2011.01015.xopenalex-extracted
INDIVIDUAL RISK ATTITUDES: MEASUREMENT, DETERMINANTS, AND BEHAVIORAL CONSEQUENCES
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb00260.xopenalex-extracted
Risk Taking in Decision Making for Others Versus the Self1
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13178openalex-extracted
How Should Autonomous Cars Drive? A Preference for Defaults in Moral Judgments Under Risk and Uncertainty
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1168244openalex-extracted
Lab Experiments Are a Major Source of Knowledge in the Social Sciences
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf2654openalex-extracted
The social dilemma of autonomous vehicles
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620948821openalex-extracted
Moral Choice When Harming Is Unavoidable
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.102.1.469openalex-extracted
A Structural Analysis of Disappointment Aversion in a Real Effort Competition
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0031461openalex-extracted
Economic Games on the Internet: The Effect of $1 Stakes
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1501972openalex-extracted
A Structural Analysis of Disappointment Aversion in a Real Effort Competition
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.320384openalex-extracted
Do High Stakes and Competition Undermine Fairness? Evidence from Russia
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2018.00031openalex-extracted
Autonomous Vehicles Require Socio-Political Acceptance—An Empirical and Philosophical Perspective on the Problem of Moral Decision Making
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-019-01273-7openalex-extracted
Online panels in social science research: Expanding sampling methods beyond Mechanical Turk
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-52020openalex-extracted
Do High Stakes and Competition Undermine Fairness? Evidence from Russia
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.41-5216openalex-extracted
Introduction to German philosophy: from Kant to Habermas
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity
Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers
publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free
and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.