On the public citation graph

Use of the Chemical Imbalance Hypothesis by Mental Health Professionals Acting as Expert Witnesses in Court

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3894374
0 signed · 12 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.
Claim with ORCID
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.
See reference health

What this work says

Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-019-10027-wopenalex-extracted
Doubting the Diagnosis but Seeking a Talking Cure: An Experimental Investigation of Causal Explanations for Depression and Willingness to Accept Treatment
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-007-9047-3openalex-extracted
The Media and the Chemical Imbalance Theory of Depression
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.apha.2020.04.004openalex-extracted
Clinical overview of NMDA-R antagonists and clinical practice
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2012.09.007openalex-extracted
The biomedical model of mental disorder: A critical analysis of its validity, utility, and effects on psychotherapy research
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2020.07.061openalex-extracted
Stressors and chemical imbalances: Beliefs about the causes of depression in an acute psychiatric treatment sample
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7028.38.4.411openalex-extracted
The "chemical imbalance" explanation for depression: Origins, lay endorsement, and clinical implications.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/00050060701280607openalex-extracted
Why promoting biological ideology increases prejudice against people labelled “schizophrenic”
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.154.6.59openalex-extracted
The Defeat Depression Campaign: psychiatry in the public arena
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2010.09121743openalex-extracted
“A Disease Like Any Other”? A Decade of Change in Public Reactions to Schizophrenia, Depression, and Alcohol Dependence
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oaopenalex-extracted
Using thematic analysis in psychology
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.173.6.519openalex-extracted
Changes in public attitudes to depression during the Defeat Depression Campaign
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.53841/bpsrep.2021.inf180openalex-extracted
BPS Code of Human Research Ethics
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.