On the public citation graph
Women in Tanzanian Parliament: Exploring Descriptive and Substantive Representation
0 signed · 19 inferred · view as graph
Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.
Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the
claims that are yours.
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a
known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped
badge you can embed.
What this work says
Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007123400005342openalex-extracted
Women Candidates for Parliament: Transforming the Agenda?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/s0008423907070059openalex-extracted
Numbers and Newness: The Descriptive and Substantive Representation of Women
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022278x00011575openalex-extracted
Why Did the Ujamaa Village Policy Fail? – Towards a Global Analysis
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/s1743923x06221019openalex-extracted
The Pros and Cons of Gender Quota Laws: What Happens When You Kick Men Out and Let Women In?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/00083968.2001.10751217openalex-extracted
Democratization and the Tanzanian State: Emerging Opportunities for Achieving Women’s Empowerment
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/00344890802079516openalex-extracted
STUDYING WOMEN'S SUBSTANTIVE REPRESENTATION IN LEGISLATURES: WHEN REPRESENTATIVE ACTS, CONTEXTS AND WOMEN'S INTERESTS BECOME IMPORTANT
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/02589001.2011.539011openalex-extracted
More women in the Tanzanian legislature: Do numbers matter?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/1461674042000324673openalex-extracted
Quotas as a ‘fast track’ to equal representation for women
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.00414openalex-extracted
Westminster Women: The Politics of Presence
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.053106.123839openalex-extracted
Women in Parliaments: Descriptive and Substantive Representation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912908322411openalex-extracted
Do Gender Quotas Foster Women’s Political Engagement?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506806060003openalex-extracted
The Complicated Relationship between Sex, Gender and the Substantive Representation of Women
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1300/j501v28n02_03openalex-extracted
WID and GAD in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania: Reappraising Gender Planning Approaches in Theory and Practice
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1515/9781626371255-003openalex-extracted
1 Women in African Parliaments: A Continental Shift?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.18235/0006873openalex-extracted
'Lady Leaders': The Case of Quotas for Women's Representation in Argentina
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/486347openalex-extracted
Democratization and the Tanzanian State: Emerging Opportunities for Achieving Women's Empowerment
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvcm4gnzopenalex-extracted
Personal Roots of Representation
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity
Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers
publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free
and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.