On the public citation graph
Key Priorities for Integrating Coastal Wetland Ecosystem Services into Law and Policy – Results of an Empirical Study in Australia
0 signed · 15 inferred · view as graph
Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.
Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the
claims that are yours.
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a
known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped
badge you can embed.
What this work says
Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/0964-5691(93)90019-uopenalex-extracted
Sustainable development and integrated coastal management
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.09.008openalex-extracted
Twenty years of ecosystem services: How far have we come and how far do we still need to go?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101148openalex-extracted
Can’t see the (mangrove) forest for the trees: Trends in the legal and policy recognition of mangrove and coastal wetland ecosystem services in Australia
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.07.005openalex-extracted
Creating win-wins from trade-offs? Ecosystem services for human well-being: A meta-analysis of ecosystem service trade-offs and synergies in the real world
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.12.002openalex-extracted
Defining consensus: A systematic review recommends methodologic criteria for reporting of Delphi studies
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.t01-1-01567.xopenalex-extracted
Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1201040109openalex-extracted
Integrating ecosystem-service tradeoffs into land-use decisions
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.593openalex-extracted
Rolling covenants to protect coastal ecosystems in the face of sea‐level rise
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01387.xopenalex-extracted
Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406915621381openalex-extracted
Utilizing and Adapting the Delphi Method for Use in Qualitative Research
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oaopenalex-extracted
Using thematic analysis in psychology
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2018.00376openalex-extracted
Mangrove Ecosystem Service Values and Methodological Approaches to Valuation: Where Do We Stand?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2020.00484openalex-extracted
Priorities and Motivations of Marine Coastal Restoration Research
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.10.8739openalex-extracted
Private protected areas in Australia: current status and future directions
What points at this work
Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2026.101544openalex-snapshot
Understanding adaptive planning intent among coastal landholders in Australia: Insights for scaling coastal restoration across private land
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity
Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers
publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free
and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.