On the public citation graph

An Extension of the Anchor-Based MID Credibility Assessment Instrument Addressing Construct Proximity is a Reliable Alternative to the Correlation Item

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4186779
0 signed · 22 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.
Claim with ORCID
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.
See reference health

What this work says

Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s11017-011-9186-9openalex-extracted
Interpretability, validity, and the minimum important difference
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-013-0443-4openalex-extracted
Don’t middle your MIDs: regression to the mean shrinks estimates of minimally important differences
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.03.012openalex-extracted
Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.07.009openalex-extracted
Using the entire cohort in the receiver operating characteristic analysis maximizes precision of the minimal important difference
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.03.011openalex-extracted
Three ways to quantify uncertainty in individually applied “minimally important change” values
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.01.028openalex-extracted
Domain-specific transition questions demonstrated higher validity than global transition questions as anchors for clinically important improvement
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.06.009openalex-extracted
Minimal important difference to infer changes in health-related quality of life—a systematic review
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.11.024openalex-extracted
Minimal important difference estimates for patient-reported outcomes: A systematic survey
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.08.029openalex-extracted
A confirmatory factor analysis approach was found to accurately estimate the reliability of transition ratings
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.10.028openalex-extracted
A systematic survey identified methodological issues in studies estimating anchor-based minimal important differences in patient-reported outcomes
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s0895-4356(02)00435-3openalex-extracted
A critical look at transition ratings
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s0954-6111(98)90426-7openalex-extracted
Quality of life in elderly patients with COPD: measurement and predictive factors
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1081/copd-200050663openalex-extracted
Approaches and Recommendations for Estimating Minimally Important Differences for Health-Related Quality of Life Measures
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.0k375.xopenalex-extracted
Commentary—Goodbye M(C)ID! Hello MID, Where Do You Come From?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m1714openalex-extracted
Evaluating the credibility of anchor based estimates of minimal important differences for patient reported outcomes: instrument development and reliability study
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1136/ebmental-2020-300164openalex-extracted
Mind the methods of determining minimal important differences: three critical issues to consider
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1136/thorax.56.11.880openalex-extracted
Health status measurement in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/2325967118782159openalex-extracted
Establishing Minimal Important Differences for the VR-12 and SANE Scores in Patients Following Treatment of Rotator Cuff Tears
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-4-70openalex-extracted
Responsiveness and minimal important differences for patient reported outcomes
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1191/0962280204sm365raopenalex-extracted
Sample size requirements for the design of reliability study: review and new results
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1586/erp.11.9openalex-extracted
A point of minimal important difference (MID): a critique of terminology and methods
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-118-8-199304150-00009openalex-extracted
Measuring Health-Related Quality of Life
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.