On the public citation graph

Appraising Health Precinct Audit Tools: Rapid Systematic Review of Evidence

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4190699

0 signed · 27 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.

Claim with ORCID

Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.

See reference health

What this work says

Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7303-9openalex-extracted

Health Impact Assessment in the United States

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24650-1_5openalex-extracted

From Green to Healthy Buildings: A Comparative Study of the USA and China

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2009.05.004openalex-extracted

Health impact assessment in planning: Development of the design for health HIA tools

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2010.01.005openalex-extracted

Testing three health impact assessment tools in planning: A process evaluation

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2010.02.005openalex-extracted

Health impact assessment in Korea

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2010.03.002openalex-extracted

Health impact assessment in Australia: A review and directions for progress

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2010.03.003openalex-extracted

Differing forms, differing purposes: A typology of health impact assessment

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2012.01.003openalex-extracted

Health impact assessment: A comparison of 45 local, national, and international guidelines

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2017.03.022openalex-extracted

Participatory quantitative health impact assessment of urban and transport planning in cities: A review and research needs

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2012.02.003openalex-extracted

Integration of health and environment through health impact assessment: Cases from three continents

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/201911102047openalex-extracted

Effects of Wellness Conscious Buildings on the Well-being and Comfort of Workers

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784483978.062openalex-extracted

Streamlining WELL Concepts of Office Buildings for Developing Countries: The Case of Malaysia

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1071/he13072openalex-extracted

Urban design and health: progress to date and future challenges

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410410001712458openalex-extracted

Changing the environment to promote health-enhancing physical activity

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2010.522851openalex-extracted

Health Impact Assessment for Urban and Land-use Planning and Policy Development: Lessons from Practice

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/17508975.2019.1678005openalex-extracted

Environmental and social sustainability – emergence of well-being in the built environment, assessment tools and real estate market implications

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1108/jcre-01-2019-0001openalex-extracted

Salutogenic workplace design

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.2018-0584openalex-extracted

Active Design Strategies and the Evolution of the WELL Building Standard™

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2012-201417openalex-extracted

Built environment change: a framework to support health-enhancing behaviour through environmental policy and health research

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0033354918798809openalex-extracted

Building Healthy Community Environments: A Public Health Approach

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456x07311073openalex-extracted

Walking, Urban Design, and Health

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0885412209358047openalex-extracted

Health Impact Assessment (HIA) for Planners: What Tools Are Useful?

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.15781/t2599zg7copenalex-extracted

Contributing with voluntary certification systems a case-study evaluating knowledge gaps between design professionals and the Well Building Standard

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.17831/rep:arcc%y558openalex-extracted

Facilitating the WELL Building Standard through Wellness Programs in the Workplace

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.93.1.118openalex-extracted

A Joint Urban Planning and Public Health Framework: Contributions to Health Impact Assessment

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3152/146155111x12959673796281openalex-extracted

Enhancing benefits in health impact assessment through stakeholder consultation

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17145249openalex-extracted

Social Return on Investment Analysis of the Health Precinct Community Hub for Chronic Conditions

Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.