On the public citation graph
What Pleases The Prince? The Relevance of Classical Legal Principles to Contemporary Public Law
0 signed · 5 inferred · view as graph
Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.
Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the
claims that are yours.
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a
known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped
badge you can embed.
What this work says
Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/1866863openalex-extracted
The Political Thought of Baldus de Ubaldis
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.193195openalex-extracted
Natural law in court: a history of legal theory in practice
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501735905openalex-extracted
Alfonso X, the Justinian of His Age
What points at this work
Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4321671openalex-extracted
The Many and the Few: On the American Lex Regia
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4596669openalex-extracted
A Reaffirmation of Statutory and Constitutional First Principles: A Comment on A, B, and C v Minister for Foreign Affairs [2023] IESC 10
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity
Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers
publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free
and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.