On the public citation graph

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4477347

0 signed · 32 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.
Claim with ORCID
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.
See reference health

What this work says

Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1001/archinternmed.2009.333openalex-extracted
Diagnostic Error in Medicine
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.295.2.172openalex-extracted
Effectiveness of Managing Suspected Pulmonary Embolism Using an Algorithm Combining Clinical Probability, D-Dimer Testing, and Computed Tomography
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s40119-020-00206-2openalex-extracted
Point-of-Care Testing for D-Dimer in the Diagnosis of Venous Thromboembolism in Primary Care: A Narrative Review
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s40119-021-00241-7openalex-extracted
Performance Evaluation of the Quantitative Point-of-Care LumiraDx d-Dimer Test
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2022.01.010openalex-extracted
Comparison of capillary and venous blood sampling for routine coagulation assays
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.thromres.2005.06.013openalex-extracted
Sensitive and quantitative, 10-min immunofluorometric assay for D-Dimer in whole blood
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.thromres.2009.07.008openalex-extracted
Performance of two relatively new quantitative D-dimer assays (Innovance D-dimer and AxSYM D-dimer) for the exclusion of deep vein thrombosis
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.thromres.2010.08.012openalex-extracted
Analytical and clinical validation of a new point-of-care testing system for determination of D-Dimer in human blood
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.thromres.2018.04.003openalex-extracted
International, multicenter evaluation of a new D-dimer assay for the exclusion of venous thromboembolism using standard and age-adjusted cut-offs
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/00365513.2020.1768586openalex-extracted
Analytical performance and user-friendliness of five novel point-of-care D-dimer assays
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/10408363.2018.1529734openalex-extracted
D-dimer: Preanalytical, analytical, postanalytical variables, and clinical applications
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmh718openalex-extracted
Limited value of patient history and physical examination in diagnosing deep vein thrombosis in primary care
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/jalm/jfab094openalex-extracted
Performance of C-Reactive Protein, Procalcitonin, TAT Complex, and Factor VIII in Addition to D-Dimer in the Exclusion of Venous Thromboembolism in Primary Care Patients
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/labmed/lmw001openalex-extracted
Widely Used Types and Clinical Applications of D-Dimer Assay
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1097/mbc.0b013e3283255381openalex-extracted
Comparison of six D-dimer assays for the detection of clinically suspected deep venous thrombosis of the lower extremities
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/ijlh.12665openalex-extracted
Review of D‐dimer testing: Good, Bad, and Ugly
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-7836.2009.03627.xopenalex-extracted
Cost‐effectiveness of ruling out deep venous thrombosis in primary care versus care as usual
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-553x.2012.01421.xopenalex-extracted
Comparison of five point‐of‐care D‐dimer assays with the standard laboratory method
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/jth.13994openalex-extracted
Age‐adjusted D‐dimer cut‐off leads to more efficient diagnosis of venous thromboembolism in the emergency department: a comparison of four assays
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1136/jclinpath-2013-201975openalex-extracted
Comparison of D-dimer point of care test (POCT) against current laboratory test in patients with suspected venous thromboembolism (VTE) presenting to the emergency department (ED)
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1160/th04-12-0829openalex-extracted
Ruling out deep venous thrombosis in primary care
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.0000078464.82671.78openalex-extracted
Natural History of Venous Thromboembolism
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.64.3.622openalex-extracted
Clinical validity of a negative venogram in patients with clinically suspected venous thrombosis.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.11613/bm.2011.010openalex-extracted
Comparison of methods: Passing and Bablok regression
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/1076029619826317openalex-extracted
The Diagnostic Efficacy of Age-Adjusted D-Dimer Cutoff Value and Pretest Probability Scores for Deep Venous Thrombosis
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2008-06-165845openalex-extracted
D-dimer antigen: current concepts and future prospects
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-018-0893-4openalex-extracted
Understanding the adoption and use of point-of-care tests in Dutch general practices using multi-criteria decision analysis
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-022-01643-9openalex-extracted
Utilization of point-of-care tests among general practitioners, a cross-sectional study
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-023-01992-zopenalex-extracted
Two point-of-care test-based approaches for the exclusion of deep vein thrombosis in general practice: a cost-effectiveness analysis
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1258/ar.2012.120105openalex-extracted
Clinical usefulness of adjusted D-dimer cut-off values to exclude pulmonary embolism in a community hospital emergency department patient population
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1586/14737159.2015.976202openalex-extracted
The cost–effectiveness of point-of-care D-dimer tests compared with a laboratory test to rule out deep venous thrombosis in primary care
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3109/00365513.2014.993697openalex-extracted
Clinical evaluation of eight different D-dimer tests for the exclusion of deep venous thrombosis in primary care patients
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.