On the public citation graph

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4479869

0 signed · 30 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.
Claim with ORCID
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.
See reference health

What this work says

Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1006/game.1995.1031openalex-extracted
On Players′ Models of Other Players: Theory and Experimental Evidence
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-006-9159-4openalex-extracted
z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-010-9251-7openalex-extracted
A finite mixture analysis of beauty-contest data using generalized beta distributions
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-012-9344-6openalex-extracted
Estimating depth of reasoning in a repeated guessing game with no feedback
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s40881-015-0003-5openalex-extracted
Naive play and the process of choice in guessing games
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s40881-019-00074-0openalex-extracted
Understanding decision processes in guessing games: a protocol analysis approach
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2681(94)90103-1openalex-extracted
Experimental evidence on players' models of other players
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2005.03.007openalex-extracted
Self-referential thinking and equilibrium as states of mind in games: fMRI evidence
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2012.02.002openalex-extracted
Beliefs and endogenous cognitive levels: An experimental study
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2013.02.012openalex-extracted
Cognitive ability and strategic sophistication
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2013.12.005openalex-extracted
Out of your mind: Eliciting individual reasoning in one shot games
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2012.05.018openalex-extracted
Cognitive effort in the Beauty Contest Game
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2015.01.006openalex-extracted
Think twice before running! Bank runs and cognitive abilities
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2019.101455openalex-extracted
Cognitive reflection test: Whom, how, when
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s0899-8256(03)00002-2openalex-extracted
‘Learning’ with no feedback in a competitive guessing game
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.3.729openalex-extracted
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/10618600.1998.10474787openalex-extracted
General Methods for Monitoring Convergence of Iterative Simulations
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-937x.2008.00498.xopenalex-extracted
Stated Beliefs and Play in Normal-Form Games
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1162/0033553041502225openalex-extracted
A Cognitive Hierarchy Model of Games
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1214/ss/1177011136openalex-extracted
Inference from Iterative Simulation Using Multiple Sequences
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1257/089533005775196732openalex-extracted
Cognitive Reflection and Decision Making
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.100.3.984openalex-extracted
Pinocchio's Pupil: Using Eyetracking and Pupil Dilation to Understand Truth Telling and Deception in Sender-Receiver Games
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.102.7.3561openalex-extracted
The 11–20 Money Request Game: A Level-k Reasoning Study
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.96.5.1737openalex-extracted
Cognition and Behavior in Two-Person Guessing Games: An Experimental Study
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.97.5.1731openalex-extracted
Fatal Attraction: Salience, Naïveté, and Sophistication in Experimental “Hide-and-Seek” Games
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.51.1.5openalex-extracted
Structural Models of Nonequilibrium Strategic Thinking: Theory, Evidence, and Applications
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.145793openalex-extracted
Cognition and Behavior in Normal-Form Games: An Experimental Study
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.586281openalex-extracted
Cognition and Behavior in Two-Person Guessing Games: An Experimental Study
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.7907/2wqmd-n6102openalex-extracted
Iterated Dominance and Iterated Best-Response in Experimental P-Beauty Contests

What points at this work

Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2024.09.007openalex-snapshot
How cognitive skills affect strategic behavior: Cognitive ability, fluid intelligence and judgment
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.