On the public citation graph
Debiasing Thinking Among Non-WEIRD Reasoners
0 signed · 31 inferred · view as graph
Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.
Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the
claims that are yours.
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a
known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped
badge you can embed.
What this work says
Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2007.06.002openalex-extracted
Conflict monitoring in dual process theories of thinking
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2016.10.014openalex-extracted
Fast logic?: Examining the time course assumption of dual process theory
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104645openalex-extracted
From bias to sound intuiting: Boosting correct intuitive reasoning
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2015.05.001openalex-extracted
What makes us think? A three-stage dual-process model of analytic engagement
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2010.07.004openalex-extracted
Associative processes in intuitive judgment
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2013.02.001openalex-extracted
The ‘whys’ and ‘whens’ of individual differences in thinking biases
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x0999152xopenalex-extracted
The weirdest people in the world?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/s1930297500008895openalex-extracted
Debiasing System 1: Training favours logical over stereotypical intuiting
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.63.7.602openalex-extracted
The neglected 95%: Why American psychology needs to become less American.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.103.2.356openalex-extracted
Rationality in the selection task: Epistemic utility versus uncertainty reduction.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.108.2.291openalex-extracted
Culture and systems of thought: Holistic versus analytic cognition.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021313openalex-extracted
When less is not always more: Stereotype knowledge and reasoning development.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/h0032240openalex-extracted
Cultural differences and inferences about psychological processes.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000323openalex-extracted
Argumentation and the diffusion of counter-intuitive beliefs.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/00207597108246692openalex-extracted
TOWARDS THE PROBLEM OF THE HISTORICAL NATURE OF PSYCHOLOGICAL PROCESSES1
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2018.1459314openalex-extracted
Miserliness in human cognition: the interaction of detection, override and mindware
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2018.1507949openalex-extracted
The Smart System 1: evidence for the intuitive nature of correct responding on the bat-and-ball problem
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2020.1793813openalex-extracted
Domain-specific experience and dual-process thinking
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2021.1885488openalex-extracted
From slow to fast logic: the development of logical intuitions
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195341140.001.0001openalex-extracted
Rationality and the Reflective Mind
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12539openalex-extracted
A 21st century cognitive portrait of the Himba, a remote people of Namibia
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-835x.1985.tb00951.xopenalex-extracted
Mathematics in the streets and in schools
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610388818openalex-extracted
For Whom Is Parting With Possessions More Painful?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021820931499openalex-extracted
An easy fix for reasoning errors: Attention capturers improve reasoning performance
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x017006014openalex-extracted
Candy Selling and Math Learning
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1241-8openalex-extracted
Algebraic reasoning and bat-and-ball problem variants: Solving isomorphic algebra first facilitates problem solving later
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037099openalex-snapshot
Arguments, more than confidence, explain the good performance of reasoning groups.
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity
Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers
publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free
and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.