On the public citation graph

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4634798

0 signed · 20 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.
Claim with ORCID
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.
See reference health

What this work says

Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.7898openalex-extracted
Return of Research Results to Study Participants
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.c.31609openalex-extracted
Genetic counselors as social and behavioral scientists in the era of precision medicine
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-016-0059-2openalex-extracted
Research Participants’ Preferences for Hypothetical Secondary Results from Genomic Research
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-011-1728-3openalex-extracted
Disparities in Enrollment and Use of an Electronic Patient Portal
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2022.100206openalex-extracted
Response rates of online surveys in published research: A meta-analysis
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gim.2022.01.002openalex-extracted
Return of genomic results does not motivate intent to participate in research for all: Perspectives across 22 countries
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/gim.2011.66openalex-extracted
Public preferences regarding the return of individual genetic research results: findings from a qualitative focus group study
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/gim.2013.63openalex-extracted
Return of incidental findings in genomic medicine: measuring what patients value—development of an instrument to measure preferences for information from next-generation testing (IMPRINT)
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/s41436-018-0061-1openalex-extracted
Returning negative results to individuals in a genomic screening program: lessons learned
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmsr1809937openalex-extracted
The “All of Us” Research Program
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0000000000004950openalex-extracted
Innovation in Large-Scale Research Programs: Elevating Research Participants to Governance Roles Through the All of Us Research Program Engagement Core
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/15404153211070821openalex-extracted
How do Hispanics/Latinos Perceive and Value the Return of Research Results?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264615572092openalex-extracted
The Development of a Preference-Setting Model for the Return of Individual Genomic Research Results
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254153openalex-extracted
Return of individual research results: What do participants prefer and expect?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0258646openalex-extracted
Return of individual research results from genomic research: A systematic review of stakeholder perspectives
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2018.05046openalex-extracted
Understanding What Information Is Valued By Research Participants, And Why
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2020.02510openalex-extracted
Health Care Spending And Use Among Hispanic Adults With And Without Limited English Proficiency, 1999–2018
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.5105openalex-extracted
Differences in Access to and Preferences for Using Patient Portals and Other eHealth Technologies Based on Race, Ethnicity, and Age: A Database and Survey Study of Seniors in a Large Health Plan
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.31478/201406aopenalex-extracted
Understanding the Relationship Between Education and Health
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.7326/m14-1118openalex-extracted
The Importance of Purpose: Moving Beyond Consent in the Societal Use of Personal Health Information
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.