On the public citation graph

Unravelling the Effects of Screening Colonoscopy on Colorectal Cancer Early Detection and Prevention:Reanalysis of the NordICC Trial

0 signed · 27 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.
Claim with ORCID
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.
See reference health

What this work says

Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19970515)16:9<1017::aid-sim508>3.0.co;2-vopenalex-extracted
ADJUSTING FOR NON-COMPLIANCE AND CONTAMINATION IN RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIALS
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.31032openalex-extracted
Early detection versus prevention in colorectal cancer screening: Methods estimates and public health implications
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.31034openalex-extracted
Early detection versus primary prevention in the PLCO flexible sigmoidoscopy screening trial: Which has the greatest impact on mortality?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-023-01031-2openalex-extracted
When gold standards are not so golden: prevalence bias in randomized trials on endoscopic colorectal cancer screening
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2019.01.014openalex-extracted
Cost-Effectiveness of Colorectal Cancer Screening Strategies—A Systematic Review
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.05.008openalex-extracted
In the era of widespread endoscopy use, randomized trials may strongly underestimate the effects of colorectal cancer screening
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lanepe.2022.100451openalex-extracted
Impact of demographic changes and screening colonoscopy on long-term projection of incident colorectal cancer cases in Germany: A modelling study
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(17)30396-3openalex-extracted
Long term effects of once-only flexible sigmoidoscopy screening after 17 years of follow-up: the UK Flexible Sigmoidoscopy Screening randomised controlled trial
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(21)00199-6openalex-extracted
Colorectal cancer incidence, mortality, and stage distribution in European countries in the colorectal cancer screening era: an international population-based study
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s2213-8587(19)30026-9openalex-extracted
The obesity transition: stages of the global epidemic
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s2468-1253(18)30358-3openalex-extracted
Effect of flexible sigmoidoscopy screening on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality: long-term follow-up of the randomised US PLCO cancer screening trial
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/s41575-022-00612-yopenalex-extracted
Current and future colorectal cancer screening strategies
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/s41575-023-00847-3openalex-extracted
Reduction in colorectal cancer incidence by screening endoscopy
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199312303292701openalex-extracted
Prevention of Colorectal Cancer by Colonoscopic Polypectomy
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmc2215192openalex-extracted
Colonoscopy Screening and Colorectal Cancer Incidence and Mortality
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa2208375openalex-extracted
Effect of Colonoscopy Screening on Risks of Colorectal Cancer and Related Death
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmsr1714643openalex-extracted
The IARC Perspective on Colorectal Cancer Screening
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g2467openalex-extracted
Effect of screening sigmoidoscopy and screening colonoscopy on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials and observational studies
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i6673openalex-extracted
Effectiveness of flexible sigmoidoscopy screening in men and women and different age groups: pooled analysis of randomised trials
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjebm-2022-112155openalex-extracted
Interpreting the results from the first randomised controlled trial of colonoscopy: does it save lives?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2018-317592openalex-extracted
Increasing incidence of colorectal cancer in young adults in Europe over the last 25 years
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2022-327736openalex-extracted
Global burden of colorectal cancer in 2020 and 2040: incidence and mortality estimates from GLOBOCAN
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21601openalex-extracted
Colorectal cancer statistics, 2020
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12061409openalex-extracted
Utilisation of Colorectal Cancer Screening Tests in European Countries by Type of Screening Offer: Results from the European Health Interview Survey
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.7326/l23-0024openalex-extracted
15-Year Benefits of Sigmoidoscopy Screening on Colorectal Cancer Incidence and Mortality
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.7326/m21-0977openalex-extracted
Long-Term Follow-up of the Italian Flexible Sigmoidoscopy Screening Trial
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.7326/m22-0835openalex-extracted
15-Year Benefits of Sigmoidoscopy Screening on Colorectal Cancer Incidence and Mortality
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.