On the public citation graph

The Effectiveness of Self-Guided Intervention in Adults with Depressive Symptoms: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4670508
0 signed · 38 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.
Claim with ORCID
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.
See reference health

What this work says

Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.0044openalex-extracted
Efficacy of Self-guided Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy in the Treatment of Depressive Symptoms
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.0268openalex-extracted
Effectiveness and Acceptability of Cognitive Behavior Therapy Delivery Formats in Adults With Depression
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2020.4364openalex-extracted
Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Depression
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.20659openalex-extracted
Perceived barriers to psychological treatments and their relationship to depression
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20083openalex-extracted
Advantages and limitations of Internet-based interventions for common mental disorders
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.21069openalex-extracted
Cognitive behavior therapy vs. control conditions, other psychotherapies, pharmacotherapies and combined treatment for depression: a comprehensive meta‐analysis including 409 trials with 52,702 patients
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-021-01246-3openalex-extracted
Meta-analysis with Robust Variance Estimation: Expanding the Range of Working Models
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2010.06.001openalex-extracted
Self-reported versus clinician-rated symptoms of depression as outcome measures in psychotherapy research on depression: A meta-analysis
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2012.11.001openalex-extracted
Impact of support on the effectiveness of written cognitive behavioural self-help: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(21)02141-3openalex-extracted
Time for united action on depression: a Lancet–World Psychiatric Association Commission
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s2215-0366(21)00077-8openalex-extracted
Dismantling, optimising, and personalising internet cognitive behavioural therapy for depression: a systematic review and component network meta-analysis using individual participant data
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/s0033291707000062openalex-extracted
What makes self-help interventions effective in the management of depressive symptoms? Meta-analysis and meta-regression
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/s0033291713001323openalex-extracted
Randomized controlled trial of computerized cognitive behavioural therapy for depressive symptoms: effectiveness and costs of a workplace intervention
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/s0033291723002246openalex-extracted
Psychotherapy for adult depression in low- and middle-income countries: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013075openalex-extracted
Psychotherapy for depression in adults: A meta-analysis of comparative outcome studies.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000171openalex-extracted
Effectiveness of an internet intervention (Deprexis) for depression in a United States adult sample: A parallel-group pragmatic randomized controlled trial.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/16506070903318960openalex-extracted
Internet-Based and Other Computerized Psychological Treatments for Adult Depression: A Meta-Analysis
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/biostatistics/kxq046openalex-extracted
Treatment-effect estimates adjusted for small-study effects via a limit meta-analysis
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1097/yco.0b013e32833ed18fopenalex-extracted
Internet-delivered psychotherapy for depression in adults
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/acps.13335openalex-extracted
The effects of psychotherapies for depression on response, remission, reliable change, and deterioration: A meta‐analysis
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0006-341x.2000.00455.xopenalex-extracted
Trim and Fill: A Simple Funnel‐Plot–Based Method of Testing and Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629openalex-extracted
Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557openalex-extracted
Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h5627openalex-extracted
Computerised cognitive behaviour therapy (cCBT) as treatment for depression in primary care (REEACT trial): large scale pragmatic randomised controlled trial
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i195openalex-extracted
Computerised cognitive behaviour therapy (cCBT) as treatment for depression in primary care (REEACT trial): large scale pragmatic randomised controlled trial
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l4898openalex-extracted
RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010247openalex-extracted
Plea for routinely presenting prediction intervals in meta-analysis
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616662243openalex-extracted
Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta-Analysis
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-9-61openalex-extracted
Exploring the nature of stigmatising beliefs about depression and help-seeking: Implications for reducing stigma
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.2023.9openalex-extracted
The WHO World Mental Health Report: a call for action
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.116.188078openalex-extracted
Undertreatment of people with major depressive disorder in 21 countries
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003107347openalex-extracted
Doing Meta-Analysis with R
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324796abm3203_12openalex-extracted
Barriers to psychotherapy among depressed and nondepressed primary care patients
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1348/014466503321903553openalex-extracted
Outcomes of patients completing and not completing cognitive therapy for depression
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003901openalex-extracted
The global gap in treatment coverage for major depressive disorder in 84 countries from 2000–2019: A systematic review and Bayesian meta-regression analysis
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0021274openalex-extracted
Self-Guided Psychological Treatment for Depressive Symptoms: A Meta-Analysis
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1602openalex-extracted
Supportive Accountability: A Model for Providing Human Support to Enhance Adherence to eHealth Interventions
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2531069openalex-extracted
Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis.
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.