On the public citation graph
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4685018
0 signed · 36 inferred · view as graph
Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.
Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the
claims that are yours.
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a
known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped
badge you can embed.
What this work says
Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.04.011openalex-extracted
Economic analysis of CO2 capture from natural gas combined cycles using Molten Carbonate Fuel Cells
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117865openalex-extracted
Sustainable transition pathways with high penetration of variable renewable energy in the coal-based energy systems
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2014.12.016openalex-extracted
Exergetic, economic, and environmental evaluations and multi-objective optimization of a combined molten carbonate fuel cell-gas turbine system
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2004.04.009openalex-extracted
Economics of biomass energy utilization in combustion and gasification plants: effects of logistic variables
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2020.105847openalex-extracted
Process modeling and optimization for biomass steam-gasification employing response surface methodology
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125412openalex-extracted
A generic input–output approach in developing and optimizing an Aspen plus steam-gasification model for biomass
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2022.08.015openalex-extracted
Process design and comprehensive comparison of coal- and biomass-fired oxy-combustion power plant
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2020.106758openalex-extracted
Biomass-based integrated gasification combined cycle with post-combustion CO2 recovery by potassium carbonate: Techno-economic and environmental analysis
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2011.02.063openalex-extracted
Techno-economic evaluation of biomass fired or co-fired power plants with post combustion CO2 capture
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2010.11.003openalex-extracted
Performance of fluidized bed steam gasification of biomass – Modeling and experiment
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2010.12.019openalex-extracted
Exergoeconomic analysis and optimization of an Integrated Solar Combined Cycle System (ISCCS) using genetic algorithm
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2013.07.030openalex-extracted
A comparative exergoeconomic analysis of two biomass and co-firing combined power plants
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2018.11.023openalex-extracted
Optimization of a triple cycle based on a solid oxide fuel cell and gas and steam cycles with a multiobjective genetic algorithm and energy, exergy and economic analyses
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2019.04.077openalex-extracted
The retrofitting of a coal-fired subcritical steam power plant for carbon dioxide capture: A comparison between MCFC-based active systems and conventional MEA
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2019.112040openalex-extracted
Thermodynamic, exergoeconomic, and environmental evaluation of a new multi-generation system driven by a molten carbonate fuel cell for production of cooling, heating, electricity, and freshwater
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2020.113143openalex-extracted
Techno-economic assessment of coal- or biomass-fired oxy-combustion power plants with supercritical carbon dioxide cycle
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2020.113594openalex-extracted
Gibbs energy minimization using Lagrange method of undetermined multipliers for electrochemical and thermodynamic modeling of a MCFC with internal steam reforming
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2009.09.031openalex-extracted
Energy and exergy analyses of an externally fired gas turbine (EFGT) cycle integrated with biomass gasifier for distributed power generation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2011.04.042openalex-extracted
Thermodynamic analysis of hydrogen rich synthetic gas generation from fluidized bed gasification of rice husk
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2014.07.006openalex-extracted
Study on a gas-steam combined cycle system with CO 2 capture by integrating molten carbonate fuel cell
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.01.095openalex-extracted
On the use of different gasification agents in a biomass fueled SOFC by integrated gasifier: A comparative exergo-economic evaluation and optimization
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.117744openalex-extracted
Experimental study on steam gasification of torrefied woodchips in a bubbling fluidized bed reactor
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.117904openalex-extracted
Sustainability evaluation of biomass direct gasification using chemical looping technology for power generation with and w/o CO2 capture
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.120511openalex-extracted
Conceptual design, exergoeconomic analysis and multi-objective optimization for a novel integration of biomass-fueled power plant with MCFC-cryogenic CO2 separation unit for low-carbon power production
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2006.03.016openalex-extracted
Biomass gasifier projects for decentralized power supply in India: A financial evaluation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2006.07.003openalex-extracted
Biomass co-firing in a pressurized fluidized bed combustion (PFBC) combined cycle power plant: A techno-environmental assessment based on computational simulations
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.10.013openalex-extracted
Comparative techno-economic assessment of biomass and coal with CCS technologies in a pulverized combustion power plant in the United Kingdom
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2018.07.023openalex-extracted
Techno-economic comparative analysis of Biomass Integrated Gasification Combined Cycles with and without CO2 capture
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.096openalex-extracted
Review on cultivation and thermochemical conversion of microalgae to fuels and chemicals: Process evaluation and knowledge gaps
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2020.104722openalex-extracted
Steam gasification with torrefaction as pretreatment to enhance syngas production from mixed food waste
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.10.040openalex-extracted
Modeling of molten carbonate fuel cell based on the volume–resistance characteristics and experimental analysis
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2016.08.069openalex-extracted
Steam gasification of biomass with subsequent syngas adjustment using shift reaction for syngas production: An Aspen Plus model
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s0360-5442(96)90000-6openalex-extracted
Thermal design and optimization
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0282-yopenalex-extracted
Country-level social cost of carbon
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2172/990108openalex-extracted
Molten Carbonate and Phosphoric Acid Stationary Fuel Cells: Overview and Gap Analysis
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3390/en10030314openalex-extracted
Simulation of Steam Gasification in a Fluidized Bed Reactor with Energy Self-Sufficient Condition
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity
Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers
publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free
and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.