On the public citation graph

Dragging Anchors in Rivers: How Open-Ended Contingent Valuation Interacts with Discrete Choice Experiments?

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4690272
0 signed · 30 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.
Claim with ORCID
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.
See reference health

What this work says

Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-1255(200009/10)15:5<447::aid-jae570>3.0.co;2-1openalex-extracted
Mixed MNL models for discrete response
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.2013openalex-extracted
Rivers under pressure: Interdisciplinary feasibility analysis of sustainable hydropower
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3684-1_1openalex-extracted
Discrete Choice Models in Preference Space and Willingness-to-Pay Space
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62669-3openalex-extracted
Environmental Valuation with Discrete Choice Experiments: Guidance on Design, Implementation and Data Analysis
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-007-9124-5openalex-extracted
Incentive and informational properties of preference questions
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-016-0045-zopenalex-extracted
Choice Consistency and Preference Stability in Test-Retests of Discrete Choice Experiment and Open-Ended Willingness to Pay Elicitation Formats
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-017-1733-3openalex-extracted
Watershed Management Benefits in a Hypothetical, Real Intention and Real Willingness to Pay Approach
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s40258-014-0137-2openalex-extracted
Comparing Willingness to Pay for Improved Drinking-Water Quality Using Stated Preference Methods in Rural and Urban Kenya
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/0921-8009(94)00044-vopenalex-extracted
Elicitation and truncation effects in contingent valuation studies
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.07.016openalex-extracted
Willingness to pay for improved water service in Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.05.003openalex-extracted
Does ecosystem valuation contribute to ecosystem decision making?: Evidence from hydropower licensing
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2008.07.005openalex-extracted
Willingness to pay for environmental improvements in hydropower regulated rivers
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2018.07.013openalex-extracted
Valuing recreational salmon fishing at a remote site in Finland: A travel cost analysis
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2019.105377openalex-extracted
Understanding angler profiles in cases of heterogeneous count data – A travel cost model
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2019.05.002openalex-extracted
Willingness to pay for forest conservation in Ecuador: Results from a nationwide contingent valuation survey in a combined “referendum” – “Consequential open-ended” design
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2023.103906openalex-extracted
Troubled waters: Riparian ecosystem services and community opposition to the largest dam removal project in Europe, Vezins Dam, France
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2023.102892openalex-extracted
Greed is good? Of equilibrium impacts in environmental regulation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2018.07.004openalex-extracted
Alternative value elicitation formats in contingent valuation: Mechanism design and convergent validity
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511753930openalex-extracted
Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1012791822804openalex-extracted
What Experimental Protocol Influence Disparities Between Actual and Hypothetical Stated Values?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1029/2010wr009592openalex-extracted
An assessment of the nonmarket benefits of the Water Framework Directive for households in England and Wales
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1086/676450openalex-extracted
Consequentiality: A Theoretical and Experimental Exploration of a Single Binary Choice
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1086/691697openalex-extracted
Contemporary Guidance for Stated Preference Studies
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/ajae/aay021openalex-extracted
Understanding Hypothetical Bias: An Enhanced Meta‐Analysis
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-9552.2010.00287.xopenalex-extracted
A Holistic vs. an Attribute-based Approach to Agri-Environmental Policy Valuation: Do Welfare Estimates Differ?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v105.i10openalex-extracted
logitr: Fast Estimation of Multinomial and Mixed Logit Models with Preference Space and Willingness-to-Pay Space Utility Parameterizations
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.437620openalex-extracted
A Meta-Analysis of Hypothetical Bias in Stated Preference Valuation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3368/le.86.2.363openalex-extracted
Using Respondent Uncertainty to Mitigate Hypothetical Bias in a Stated Choice Experiment
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3934/energy.2015.3.316openalex-extracted
Using Choice Experiments to Assess Environmental Impacts of Dams in Portugal
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5751/es-02931-140204openalex-extracted
Conflicts Associated with Dam Removal in Sweden
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.