On the public citation graph
Inconsistent Multiple Testing Corrections: The Fallacy of Using Family-Based Error Rates to Make Inferences About Individual Hypotheses
0 signed · 44 inferred · view as graph
Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.
Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the
claims that are yours.
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a
known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped
badge you can embed.
What this work says
Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470316672openalex-extracted
Multiple Comparison Procedures
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470723586openalex-extracted
Statistical Issues in Drug Development
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-003-1387-7openalex-extracted
On the logic of hypothesis testing in functional imaging
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09797-3openalex-extracted
The Role of Mental Effort in Students’ Perceptions of the Effectiveness of Interleaved and Blocked Study Strategies and Their Willingness to Use Them
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-021-03276-4openalex-extracted
When to adjust alpha during multiple testing: a consideration of disjunction, conjunction, and individual testing
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-022-09525-7openalex-extracted
What Will You Do When They Think It Was You? Counter-interrogation Strategies of Innocent Interviewees Under Suspicion vs. No Suspicion
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-020-00309-6openalex-extracted
“Repeated sampling from the same population?” A critique of Neyman and Pearson’s responses to Fisher
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2021.106656openalex-extracted
Multiplicity adjustments in parallel-group multi-arm trials sharing a control group: Clear guidance is needed
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2012.05.1013openalex-extracted
P2‐304: Guidelines for reporting clinical trial methodology research: The seven deadly sins
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metip.2023.100120openalex-extracted
Use and misuse of corrections for multiple testing
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000123openalex-extracted
Do p Values Lose Their Meaning in Exploratory Analyses? It Depends How You Define the Familywise Error Rate
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000154openalex-extracted
The Ouroboros of Psychological Methodology: The Case of Effect Sizes (Mechanical Objectivity vs. Expertise)
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040447openalex-extracted
A note on the inconsistency inherent in the necessity to perform multiple comparisons.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/h0061802openalex-extracted
The problem of quantification in psychological science.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/h0074554openalex-extracted
Mathematical vs. scientific significance.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1076/chin.9.3.221.16455openalex-extracted
Statistical Practices: The Seven Deadly Sins
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/19312450701641409openalex-extracted
Familywise Error in Multiple Comparisons: Disentangling a Knot through a Critique of O'Keefe's Arguments against Alpha Adjustment
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/55.1.1openalex-extracted
Prediction Versus Accommodation and the Risk of Overfitting
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a117737openalex-extracted
Multiple Comparisons and Related Issues in the Interpretation of Epidemiologic Data
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1097/00001648-199001000-00010openalex-extracted
No Adjustments Are Needed for Multiple Comparisons
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.200805openalex-extracted
The case for formal methodology in scientific reform
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-842x.2012.00652.xopenalex-extracted
LOPSIDED REASONING ON LOPSIDED TESTS AND MULTIPLE COMPARISONS
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00512.xopenalex-extracted
When to Combine Hypotheses and Adjust for Multiple Tests
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/opo.12131openalex-extracted
When to use the B onferroni correction
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/ppe.12711openalex-extracted
Analysis goals, error‐cost sensitivity, and analysis hacking: Essential considerations in hypothesis testing and multiple comparisons
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.316.7139.1236openalex-extracted
What's wrong with Bonferroni adjustments
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/1740774520941419openalex-extracted
Non-adjustment for multiple testing in multi-arm trials of distinct treatments: Rationale and justification
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916211017098openalex-extracted
Beyond Statistical Ritual: Theory in Psychological Science
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918771329openalex-extracted
Statistical Rituals: The Replication Delusion and How We Got There
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05975-2openalex-extracted
Multiple secondary outcome analyses: precise interpretation is important
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177729029openalex-extracted
On a Heuristic Method of Test Construction and its use in Multivariate Analysis
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.20935/al610openalex-extracted
There’s No Need to Lower the Significance Threshold When Conducting Single Tests of Multiple Individual Hypotheses
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.20982/tqmp.16.4.p376openalex-extracted
Does preregistration improve the credibility of research findings?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.22237/jmasm/1430453040openalex-extracted
Are Per-Family Type I Error Rates Relevant in Social and Behavioral Science?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.22237/jmasm/1556669400openalex-extracted
Misguided Opposition to Multiplicity Adjustment Remains a Problem
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2983471openalex-extracted
Multiplicity Considerations in the Design and Analysis of Clinical Trials
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.679471openalex-extracted
Development and Initial Validation of a Scale to Measure Cognitive Demands of Flexible Work
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.36850/4d35-44bdopenalex-extracted
Type I Error Rates are Not Usually Inflated
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315629049-29openalex-extracted
The Problem is Epistemology, Not Statistics: Replace Significance Tests by Confidence Intervals and Quantify Accuracy of Risky Numerical Predictions
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5334/irsp.181openalex-extracted
A Practical Primer To Power Analysis for Simple Experimental Designs
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5735/086.046.0501openalex-extracted
Final Collapse of the Neyman-Pearson Decision Theoretic Framework and Rise of the neoFisherian
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity
Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers
publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free
and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.