On the public citation graph

Ontological Frames Decisively Outperform Moral Foundations in Predicting Moral Judgments

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4724806
0 signed · 26 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.
Claim with ORCID
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.
See reference health

What this work says

Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/cd.23219780204openalex-extracted
Speaking of rules: The analysis of culture in breach
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19671-8_2openalex-extracted
Morality as Cooperation: A Problem-Centred Approach
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-007-0034-zopenalex-extracted
When Morality Opposes Justice: Conservatives Have Moral Intuitions that Liberals may not Recognize
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-407236-7.00002-4openalex-extracted
Moral Foundations Theory
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2011.04.005openalex-extracted
When ignorance is no excuse: Different roles for intent across moral domains
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2013.11.007openalex-extracted
Tainting the soul: Purity concerns predict moral judgments of suicide
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2021.103134openalex-extracted
Cognition in moral space: A minimal model
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2012.01.006openalex-extracted
Tracing the threads: How five moral concerns (especially Purity) help explain culture war attitudes
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2018.10.008openalex-extracted
Mapping morality with a compass: Testing the theory of ‘morality-as-cooperation’ with a new questionnaire
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139166515.004openalex-extracted
Ghost busters in anthropology
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015141openalex-extracted
Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021847openalex-extracted
Mapping the moral domain.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000086openalex-extracted
Moral expansiveness: Examining variability in the extension of the moral world.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000470openalex-extracted
Morality beyond the WEIRD: How the nomological network of morality varies across cultures.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-023-01693-8openalex-extracted
Moral foundations elicit shared and dissociable cortical activation modulated by political ideology
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2021.1942811openalex-extracted
The nonmoral conditions of moral cognition
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1086/701478openalex-extracted
Is It Good to Cooperate? Testing the Theory of Morality-as-Cooperation in 60 Societies
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgad210openalex-extracted
The (moral) language of hate
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1162/0011526042365555openalex-extracted
Intuitive ethics: how innately prepared intuitions generate culturally variable virtues
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797619855382openalex-extracted
Specks of Dirt and Tons of Pain: Dosage Distinguishes Impurity From Harm
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721417730888openalex-extracted
Toward a Psychology of Moral Expansiveness
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868317698288openalex-extracted
The Theory of Dyadic Morality: Reinventing Moral Judgment by Redefining Harm
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691619867106openalex-extracted
What Are the Irreducible Basic Elements of Morality? A Critique of the Debate Over Monism and Pluralism in Moral Psychology
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550618801326openalex-extracted
Which Appraisals Are Foundational to Moral Judgment? Harm, Injustice, and Beyond
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0042366openalex-extracted
Understanding Libertarian Morality: The Psychological Dispositions of Self-Identified Libertarians
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/q6c9ropenalex-extracted
Morality Beyond the WEIRD: How the Nomological Network of Morality Varies Across Cultures
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.