On the public citation graph

Policy Analysis of Wood Circularity in Construction: Current Policy Objectives and Instruments in Norway

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4768397
0 signed · 39 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.
Claim with ORCID
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.
See reference health

What this work says

Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01824-zopenalex-extracted
Investigating the connection between stakeholders’ purchase intention and perceived value of construction and demolition waste recycled products
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-006-9025-4openalex-extracted
What work makes policy?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.122906openalex-extracted
Circular vs. linear economy of building materials: A case study for particleboards made of recycled wood and biopolymer vs. conventional particleboards
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.11.001openalex-extracted
Transition Towards a Resource Efficient Circular Economy in Europe: Policy Lessons From the EU and the Member States
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.12.012openalex-extracted
The Circular Economy: Swings and Roundabouts?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2016.10.006openalex-extracted
A transition to green buildings in Norway
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101513openalex-extracted
Transforming or tinkering at the margins? Assessing policy strategies for heating decarbonisation in Germany and the United Kingdom
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.055openalex-extracted
Circular economy for the built environment: A research framework
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.006openalex-extracted
Understanding and overcoming the barriers to structural steel reuse, a UK perspective
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.233openalex-extracted
Comparative LCA of wood waste management strategies generated from building construction activities
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.216openalex-extracted
Swedish architects view of engineered wood products in buildings
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.125985openalex-extracted
Comparing policy options for carbon efficiency in the wood value chain: Evidence from Austria
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128413openalex-extracted
Reuse of building elements in the architectural practice and the European regulatory context: Inconsistencies and possible improvements
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130395openalex-extracted
Drivers and barriers towards circular economy in the building sector: Stakeholder interviews and analysis of five European countries policies and practices
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130494openalex-extracted
Barriers, success factors, and perspectives for the reuse of construction products in Norway
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133918openalex-extracted
The circular built environment toolbox: A systematic literature review of policy instruments
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137067openalex-extracted
User perspectives on reuse of construction products in Norway: Results of a national survey
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103523openalex-extracted
Relation between construction company size and the use of recycled materials
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2009.07.004openalex-extracted
A discussion on the reuse of building components in Brazil: An analysis of major social, economical and legal factors
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.04.006openalex-extracted
Deconstruction of wood-framed houses: Material recovery and environmental impact
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.07.045openalex-extracted
Resource efficiency of multifunctional wood cascade chains using LCA and exergy analysis, exemplified by a case study for Germany
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.005openalex-extracted
Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.10.036openalex-extracted
Circular building materials: Carbon saving potential and the role of business model innovation and public policy
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.02.005openalex-extracted
Reconceptualising the ‘policy mix’ for innovation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.04.014openalex-extracted
Delineating policy mixes: Contrasting top-down and bottom-up approaches to the case of energy-storage policy in California
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.09.003openalex-extracted
Policies, actors and sustainability transition pathways: A study of the EU’s energy policy mix
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.117openalex-extracted
Eco-efficiency analysis of recycling recovered solid wood from construction into laminated timber products
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2017.08.013openalex-extracted
Policy trends for the sustainability assessment of construction materials: A review
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tfp.2022.100244openalex-extracted
Opportunities and barriers for wood-based infrastructure in urban Himalayas: A review of selected national policies of Nepal
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2019.05.040openalex-extracted
Reusing exterior wall framing systems: A cradle-to-cradle comparative life cycle assessment
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s1462-9011(99)00038-6openalex-extracted
Wood-based building materials and atmospheric carbon emissions
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2016.1086872openalex-extracted
Construction sector views on low carbon building materials
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2014.924206openalex-extracted
The innovativeness of national policy portfolios – climate policy change in Austria, Germany, and the UK
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/225/1/012061openalex-extracted
Barriers and opportunities to reuse of building materials in the Norwegian construction sector
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12477openalex-extracted
Uncovering the verticality and temporality of environmental policy mixes: The case of agricultural residue recycling in China
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1680/jwarm.16.00011openalex-extracted
Circular economy in construction: current awareness, challenges and enablers
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3390/su13169350openalex-extracted
Policies as Drivers for Circular Economy in the Construction Sector in the Nordics
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3403/30204399openalex-extracted
Sustainability of construction works. Assessment of environmental performance of buildings. Calculation method
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.6027/tn2018-517openalex-extracted
Circular Economy in the Nordic Construction Sector
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.