On the public citation graph

Public Understanding of the Relationship between Climate Change and Natural Gas: A Case Study from Turkey

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4782976
0 signed · 70 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.
Claim with ORCID
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.
See reference health

What this work says

Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/ese3.35openalex-extracted
A bridge to nowhere: methane emissions and the greenhouse gas footprint of natural gas
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.275openalex-extracted
Qualitative thematic analysis based on descriptive phenomenology
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-022-02345-7openalex-extracted
Public perception of transitioning to a low-carbon nation: a Malaysian scenario
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-015-0068-zopenalex-extracted
Public Perceptions and Support of Renewable Energy in North America in the Context of Global Climate Change
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s42330-020-00123-5openalex-extracted
Informed-Decision Regarding Global Warming and Climate Change Among High School Students in the United Kingdom
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.09.004openalex-extracted
UK public perceptions of shale gas hydraulic fracturing: The role of audience, message and contextual factors on risk perceptions and policy support
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coche.2014.05.004openalex-extracted
Methane emissions from natural gas production and use: reconciling bottom-up and top-down measurements
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2018.06.019openalex-extracted
Fossil fuels, alternative energy and economic growth
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2018.11.073openalex-extracted
An integrated review and analysis of multi-energy transition from fossil fuels to renewables
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2014.12.053openalex-extracted
Probing public perceptions on energy: Support for a comparative, deep-probing survey design for complex issue domains
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2023.128704openalex-extracted
Determinants of public preferences on low-carbon energy sources: Evidence from the United Kingdom
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.04.020openalex-extracted
Energy sources, public policy, and public preferences: Analysis of US national and site-specific data
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.06.011openalex-extracted
Constraints of fossil fuels depletion on global warming projections
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.06.068openalex-extracted
Nuclear renaissance, public perception and design criteria: An exploratory review
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.04.072openalex-extracted
Citizens’ preferences on nuclear and renewable energy sources: Evidence from Turkey
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.01.051openalex-extracted
Public attitudes to climate change and carbon mitigation—Implications for energy-associated behaviours
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.06.098openalex-extracted
Knowledge, risk, and policy support: Public perceptions of nuclear power
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.08.015openalex-extracted
Public perceptions of climate change and energy futures before and after the Fukushima accident: A comparison between Britain and Japan
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.10.017openalex-extracted
“Fracking” controversy and communication: Using national survey data to understand public perceptions of hydraulic fracturing
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.10.079openalex-extracted
Exploring public perceptions of energy security risks in the UK
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.09.003openalex-extracted
Public preferences for investments in renewable energy production and energy efficiency
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.07.032openalex-extracted
How geographic distance and political ideology interact to influence public perception of unconventional oil/natural gas development
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.09.026openalex-extracted
Public perceptions and acceptance of induced earthquakes related to energy development
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.09.061openalex-extracted
The good, the bad, and the ambivalent: A qualitative study of public perceptions towards energy technologies and portfolios in Germany
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.02.007openalex-extracted
Public perception of energy transition in Korea: Nuclear power, climate change, and party preference
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.03.002openalex-extracted
Public perceptions of energy policies: Predicting support, opposition, and nonsubstantive responses
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.05.043openalex-extracted
Turkish public preferences for energy
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101554openalex-extracted
“Risky transitions?” Risk perceptions, public concerns, and energy infrastructure in Germany
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.06.005openalex-extracted
Citizens’ preferences for tackling climate change. Quantitative and qualitative analyses of their freely formulated solutions
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.07.046openalex-extracted
Life cycle environmental impacts of electricity from fossil fuels in Turkey
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.09.001openalex-extracted
Understanding public perception of hydraulic fracturing: a case study in Spain
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.05.007openalex-extracted
Find the differences and the similarities: Relating perceived benefits, perceived costs and protected values to acceptance of five energy technologies
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101671openalex-extracted
Different names for “natural gas” influence public perception of it
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2021.104191openalex-extracted
Experimental investigation of influencing parameters on natural gas odor fading in gas distribution networks
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ngib.2020.04.003openalex-extracted
Natural gas industry in China: Development situation and prospect
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2011.09.006openalex-extracted
Sources and mitigation of methane emissions by sectors: A critical review
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.08.006openalex-extracted
Factors influencing the electricity generation preferences of Turkish citizens: Citizens' attitudes and policy recommendations in the context of climate change and environmental impact
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2011.07.101openalex-extracted
Social acceptance of the clean energy concept: Exploring the clean energy understanding of Istanbul residents
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.11.048openalex-extracted
Identifying and explaining public preferences for the attributes of energy technologies
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.017openalex-extracted
Public perception of carbon capture and storage (CCS): A review
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.109713openalex-extracted
Factors influencing public perceptions of hydropower projects: A systematic literature review
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110609openalex-extracted
A review of Africa's transition from fossil fuels to renewable energy using circular economy principles
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(15)60854-6openalex-extracted
Health and climate change: policy responses to protect public health
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/s1466046613000021openalex-extracted
Research Articles: Risk Perceptions of Natural Gas Development in the Marcellus Shale
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.6b00144openalex-extracted
The Natural Gas Supply Chain: The Importance of Methane and Carbon Dioxide Emissions
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/s41579-019-0222-5openalex-extracted
Scientists’ warning to humanity: microorganisms and climate change
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/s43586-022-00150-6openalex-extracted
Interviews in the social sciences
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/00207659.2018.1560979openalex-extracted
Climate Change Views, Energy Policy Preferences, and Intended Actions Across Welfare State Regimes: Evidence from the European Social Survey
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/02646811.2018.1450895openalex-extracted
Climate change caused by human activities is happening and it already has major consequences
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2018.1483885openalex-extracted
The threat to climate change mitigation posed by the abundance of fossil fuels
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab7d01openalex-extracted
NIMBY, YIMBY, or something else? Geographies of public perceptions of shale gas development in the Marcellus Shale
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfp041openalex-extracted
Public Attitudes Toward Construction of New Power Plants
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2012.0324openalex-extracted
The future of oil: unconventional fossil fuels
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01535.xopenalex-extracted
Energy Choices and Risk Beliefs: Is It Just Global Warming and Fear of a Nuclear Power Plant Accident?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8287.1996.tb00490.xopenalex-extracted
Social cognition and social structure in the prediction of cervical screening uptake
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-earth-071719-055228openalex-extracted
Climate Extremes and Compound Hazards in a Warming World
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716214556472openalex-extracted
The Influence of Specific Risk Perceptions on Public Policy Support
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0731121414567355openalex-extracted
Differences in Public Perceptions and Leaders’ Perceptions on Hydraulic Fracturing and Shale Development
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0958305x17705948openalex-extracted
Public attitudes toward the construction of new power plants in South Korea
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oaopenalex-extracted
Using thematic analysis in psychology
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.32.4.33openalex-extracted
Quantifying Economic Damages from Climate Change
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1260/0958-305x.21.5.385openalex-extracted
Public Perceptions of Energy Choices: The Influence of Beliefs about Climate Change and the Environment
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1557/mre.2015.12openalex-extracted
Public perception of and engagement with emerging low-carbon energy technologies: A literature review
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2118/0319-0027-jptopenalex-extracted
The Challenge of Public Perception
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3390/en13081940openalex-extracted
Public Preferences in a Shifting Energy Future: Comparing Public Views of Eight Energy Sources in North America’s Pacific Northwest
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.4236/ajcc.2020.93012openalex-extracted
Markers for Global Climate Change and Its Impact on Social, Biological and Ecological Systems: A Review
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5114/cipp.2016.63938openalex-extracted
Trust in the source of received information as a factor related to public perception of shale gas drilling
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5430/elr.v3n1p39openalex-extracted
Interviewing as a Data Collection Method: A Critical Review
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.51-2430openalex-extracted
Mastering the semi-structured interview and beyond: from research design to analysis and publication
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2020.7.4(21)openalex-extracted
Global climate change and greenhouse effect
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.