On the public citation graph
Do Good Practices Lead to More Bug-Finding Effectiveness of Test Cases? A Study Based on Repository Mining
0 signed · 43 inferred · view as graph
Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.
Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the
claims that are yours.
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a
known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped
badge you can embed.
What this work says
Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35333-9_3openalex-extracted
Test-Case Quality – Understanding Practitioners’ Perspectives
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-014-9313-0openalex-extracted
Are test smells really harmful? An empirical study
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-021-10083-5openalex-extracted
A fine-grained data set and analysis of tangling in bug fixing commits
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2010.12.003openalex-extracted
A systematic mapping study of software product lines testing
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2014.04.002openalex-extracted
On strategies for testing software product lines: A systematic literature review
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2006.02.036openalex-extracted
An empirical study into class testability
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2016.03.003openalex-extracted
The Impacts of Test Automation on Software's Cost, Quality and Time to Market
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1109/c-m.1978.218136openalex-extracted
Hints on Test Data Selection: Help for the Practicing Programmer
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1109/icse-seip.2019.00015openalex-extracted
Practitioners' Views on Good Software Testing Practices
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1109/icse.2012.6227157openalex-extracted
Amplifying tests to validate exception handling code
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1109/icsm.2012.6405253openalex-extracted
An empirical analysis of the distribution of unit test smells and their impact on software maintenance
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1109/icsme.2014.32openalex-extracted
Do They Really Smell Bad? A Study on Developers' Perception of Bad Code Smells
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1109/icsme.2018.00040openalex-extracted
Automatic Test Smell Detection Using Information Retrieval Techniques
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1109/icsme46990.2020.00083openalex-extracted
De-Flake Your Tests : Automatically Locating Root Causes of Flaky Tests in Code At Google
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1109/icst.2013.45openalex-extracted
Automated Detection of Test Fixture Strategies and Smells
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1109/icst.2016.33openalex-extracted
Test Set Diameter: Quantifying the Diversity of Sets of Test Cases
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1109/icstw58534.2023.00071openalex-extracted
On factors that impact the relationship between code coverage and test suite effectiveness: a survey
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1109/issre.2014.11openalex-extracted
A Survey on Unit Testing Practices and Problems
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1109/qsic.2014.33openalex-extracted
Empirically Evaluating the Quality of Automatically Generated and Manually Written Test Suites
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1109/saner.2015.7081877openalex-extracted
Code coverage and test suite effectiveness: Empirical study with real bugs in large systems
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1109/saner.2019.8668001openalex-extracted
Unveiling Exception Handling Guidelines Adopted by Java Developers
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1109/tse.1977.231145openalex-extracted
Testing Programs with the Aid of a Compiler
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1109/tse.2007.70745openalex-extracted
On The Detection of Test Smells: A Metrics-Based Approach for General Fixture and Eager Test
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1109/tse.2010.62openalex-extracted
An Analysis and Survey of the Development of Mutation Testing
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1109/tse.2017.2716925openalex-extracted
Global-Aware Recommendations for Repairing Violations in Exception Handling
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1109/tse.2018.2870414openalex-extracted
How Practitioners Perceive Automated Bug Report Management Techniques
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1109/tse.2019.2903057openalex-extracted
Lightweight Assessment of Test-Case Effectiveness Using Source-Code-Quality Indicators
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1109/tse.2021.3129889openalex-extracted
How Developers Engineer Test Cases: An Observational Study
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/1985441.1985454openalex-extracted
A simpler model of software readability
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/2483760.2483769openalex-extracted
Comparing non-adequate test suites using coverage criteria
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/2568225.2568278openalex-extracted
Code coverage for suite evaluation by developers
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/2591062.2591164openalex-extracted
Comparing test quality measures for assessing student-written tests
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/2635868.2635906openalex-extracted
Test case purification for improving fault localization
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/2661136.2661157openalex-extracted
Coverage and Its Discontents
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/2786805.2786809openalex-extracted
How practitioners perceive the relevance of software engineering research
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/2931037.2931051openalex-extracted
Practitioners' expectations on automated fault localization
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/2973839.2973843openalex-extracted
An Exploratory Study of Exception Handling Behavior in Evolving Android and Java Applications
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/3195538.3195541openalex-extracted
Test case quality as perceived in Sweden
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/3202710.3203153openalex-extracted
On the effectiveness of unit tests in test-driven development
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/3236024.3275529openalex-extracted
The impact of failing, flaky, and high failure tests on the number of crash reports associated with Firefox builds
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/3238147.3238213openalex-extracted
How many of all bugs do we find? a study of static bug detectors
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/3293882.3338984openalex-extracted
A new dimension of test quality: assessing and generating higher quality unit test cases
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity
Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers
publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free
and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.