On the public citation graph

Should the Landlord Port Authority Negotiate Concession Contracts with Terminal Operators?

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4845215
0 signed · 34 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.
Claim with ORCID
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.
See reference health

What this work says

Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1006/jeth.1994.1005openalex-snapshot
An N-Person Pure Bargaining Game
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s00182-008-0130-9openalex-snapshot
Stable profit sharing in a patent licensing game: general bargaining outcomes
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-021-09837-wopenalex-snapshot
Risk aversion for losses and the Nash bargaining solution
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jet.2010.04.003openalex-snapshot
Non-cooperative support for the asymmetric Nash bargaining solution
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2010.12.001openalex-snapshot
Bargaining outcomes in patent licensing: Asymptotic results in a general Cournot market
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2013.05.002openalex-snapshot
Stable bargaining outcomes in patent licensing: A cooperative game approach without side payments
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rie.2016.08.004openalex-snapshot
Patent Licensing and Bargaining with Innovative Complements and Substitutes
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2016.05.003openalex-snapshot
Quasi-landlord port financing in China: Features, practice and a contract theory analysis
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2020.05.022openalex-snapshot
Optimal concession contracts for landlord port authorities under incomplete information
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2017.08.014openalex-snapshot
Optimal concession contracts for landlord port authorities to maximize fee revenues with minimal throughput requirements
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s0165-1765(98)00092-5openalex-snapshot
Fee versus royalty licensing in a Cournot duopoly model
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s0739-8859(06)17010-9openalex-snapshot
Chapter 10 Port Governance and Privatization in the United States: Public Ownership and Private Operation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1057/mel.2010.8openalex-snapshot
Container terminal concessions: A game theory application to the case of the ports of Pakistan
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ijme.9100008openalex-snapshot
Reassessing Public Sector Involvement in European Seaports
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2012.664576openalex-snapshot
Risk-Sharing in Seaport Terminal Concessions
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/03088830210132579openalex-snapshot
Privatization trends at the world's top-100 container ports
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2011.642311openalex-snapshot
A new approach to granting terminal concessions: the case of the Rotterdam World Gateway terminal
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2011.642315openalex-snapshot
Current practices in European ports on the awarding of seaport terminals to private operators: towards an industry good practice guide
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2013.863435openalex-snapshot
Optimal concession contracts for landlord port authorities to maximize traffic volumes
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2018.1479544openalex-snapshot
Optimal concession contracts for landlord port authorities with different pursuing goals
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/13504850110046831openalex-snapshot
The patent holder's bargaining power and the licensing of an innovation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8586.2010.00356.xopenalex-snapshot
FEE VERSUS ROYALTY POLICY IN LICENSING THROUGH BARGAINING: AN APPLICATION OF THE NASH BARGAINING SOLUTION
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-7363.2013.12020.xopenalex-snapshot
Bargaining and delay in patent licensing
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1287/moor.2.1.64openalex-snapshot
Individual Rationality and Nash's Solution to the Bargaining Problem
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1504/ijstl.2014.057810openalex-snapshot
Optimal concession contracts for landlord port authorities to maximise fee revenues
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1504/ijstl.2017.082521openalex-snapshot
Optimal concession contracts for landlord port authorities under price competition of terminal operators
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1596/28309openalex-snapshot
Container Terminal Concession Guidelines
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1259002openalex-snapshot
Non-Cooperative Support for the Asymmetric Nash Bargaining Solution
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/1885693openalex-snapshot
Fees Versus Royalties and the Private Value of a Patent
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/1907266openalex-snapshot
The Bargaining Problem
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/1912531openalex-snapshot
Perfect Equilibrium in a Bargaining Model
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2298115openalex-snapshot
Multilateral Bargaining
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2555382openalex-snapshot
The Nash Bargaining Solution in Economic Modelling
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2555525openalex-snapshot
Price and Quantity Competition in a Differentiated Duopoly
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.