On the public citation graph

Accounting for Differential Exclusions in the Nordicc Trial Discloses Stronger-than-Reported Effects of Screening Colonoscopy

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4848980
0 signed · 23 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.
Claim with ORCID
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.
See reference health

What this work says

Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2014.8266openalex-extracted
Effect of Flexible Sigmoidoscopy Screening on Colorectal Cancer Incidence and Mortality
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.0960openalex-extracted
Population-Based Colonoscopy Screening for Colorectal Cancer
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19970515)16:9<1017::aid-sim508>3.0.co;2-vopenalex-extracted
ADJUSTING FOR NON-COMPLIANCE AND CONTAMINATION IN RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIALS
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.33916openalex-extracted
Trends in the incidence of early‐onset colorectal cancer in all 50 United States from 2001 through 2017
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-023-01031-2openalex-extracted
When gold standards are not so golden: prevalence bias in randomized trials on endoscopic colorectal cancer screening
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canep.2017.05.007openalex-extracted
The completeness and timeliness of cancer registration and the implications for measuring cancer burden
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101793openalex-extracted
Intention to probe into the colonoscopy trial: is it the procedure or the trial that failed?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2013.11.040openalex-extracted
Completeness and timeliness: Cancer registries could/should improve their performance
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2023.06.059openalex-extracted
Which results would the NordICC trial have found if screening colonoscopy had prevented all incident colorectal cancers?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(10)60551-xopenalex-extracted
Once-only flexible sigmoidoscopy screening in prevention of colorectal cancer: a multicentre randomised controlled trial
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(21)00199-6openalex-extracted
Colorectal cancer incidence, mortality, and stage distribution in European countries in the colorectal cancer screening era: an international population-based study
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/s41575-023-00847-3openalex-extracted
Reduction in colorectal cancer incidence by screening endoscopy
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2017.05.013openalex-extracted
Colorectal Cancer Screening: Recommendations for Physicians and Patients From the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0032-1306895openalex-extracted
The NordICC Study: Rationale and design of a randomized trial on colonoscopy screening for colorectal cancer
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199312303292701openalex-extracted
Prevention of Colorectal Cancer by Colonoscopic Polypectomy
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1114635openalex-extracted
Colorectal-Cancer Incidence and Mortality with Screening Flexible Sigmoidoscopy
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa2208375openalex-extracted
Effect of Colonoscopy Screening on Risks of Colorectal Cancer and Related Death
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmsr1714643openalex-extracted
The IARC Perspective on Colorectal Cancer Screening
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djr284openalex-extracted
Once-Only Sigmoidoscopy in Colorectal Cancer Screening: Follow-up Findings of the Italian Randomized Controlled Trial--SCORE
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g2467openalex-extracted
Effect of screening sigmoidoscopy and screening colonoscopy on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials and observational studies
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21395openalex-extracted
Colorectal cancer statistics, 2017
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21772openalex-extracted
Colorectal cancer statistics, 2023
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1219128openalex-extracted
Quality indicators: completeness, validity and timeliness of cancer registry data contributing to the European Cancer Information System
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.