On the public citation graph

Knowing What We Don't Know: Targeting Overconfidence to Combat Misinformation

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4872927
0 signed · 59 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.
Claim with ORCID
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.
See reference health

What this work says

Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/gch2.201600008openalex-extracted
Inoculating the Public against Misinformation about Climate Change
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1135openalex-extracted
How Stories in Memory Perpetuate the Continued Influence of False Information
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.011openalex-extracted
Lazy, not biased: Susceptibility to partisan fake news is better explained by lack of reasoning than by motivated reasoning
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2023.101735openalex-extracted
Confidence as a metacognitive contributor to and consequence of misinformation experiences
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2013.11.002openalex-extracted
Overconfidence, risk perception and the risk-taking behavior of finance professionals
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2023.103761openalex-extracted
Actively open-minded thinking is key to combating fake news: A multimethod study
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2018.09.001openalex-extracted
Fake News, Real Problems for Brands: The Impact of Content Truthfulness and Source Credibility on consumers’ Behavioral Intentions toward the Advertised Brands
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2018.09.005openalex-extracted
Belief in Fake News is Associated with Delusionality, Dogmatism, Religious Fundamentalism, and Reduced Analytic Thinking
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.07.004openalex-extracted
True overconfidence: The inability of rational information processing to account for apparent overconfidence
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2017.03.002openalex-extracted
Estimating the relationship between skill and overconfidence
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/s1930297500003570openalex-extracted
Susceptibility to misinformation is consistent across question framings and response modes and better explained by myside bias and partisanship than analytical thinking
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/xps.2020.37openalex-extracted
All the News That’s Fit to Fabricate: AI-Generated Text as a Tool of Media Misinformation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.77.6.1121openalex-extracted
Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.119.2.254openalex-extracted
Effects of feedback intervention on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-1523.3.4.552openalex-extracted
Knowing with certainty: The appropriateness of extreme confidence.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.115.2.502openalex-extracted
The trouble with overconfidence.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028085openalex-extracted
Identifying careless responses in survey data.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000315openalex-extracted
Long-term effectiveness of inoculation against misinformation: Three longitudinal experiments.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000465openalex-extracted
Prior exposure increases perceived accuracy of fake news.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000729openalex-extracted
Fake news, fast and slow: Deliberation reduces belief in false (but not true) news headlines.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001395openalex-extracted
Gamified inoculation interventions do not improve discrimination between true and fake news: Reanalyzing existing research with receiver operating characteristic analysis.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000977openalex-extracted
Misinformed and unaware? Metacognition and the influence of inaccurate information.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1547openalex-extracted
The polarizing impact of science literacy and numeracy on perceived climate change risks
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-024-01884-xopenalex-extracted
Prominent misinformation interventions reduce misperceptions but increase scepticism
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03344-2openalex-extracted
Shifting attention to accuracy can reduce misinformation online
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1517441113openalex-extracted
The spreading of misinformation online
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1920498117openalex-extracted
A digital media literacy intervention increases discernment between mainstream and false news in the United States and India
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2019527118openalex-extracted
Overconfidence in news judgments is associated with false news susceptibility
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853x.2019.1598167openalex-extracted
Challenges in Processes of Validation and Comprehension
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2019.1633404openalex-extracted
Overconfidently underthinking: narcissism negatively predicts cognitive reflection
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8586.2009.00345.xopenalex-extracted
THE EFFECTS OF FEEDBACK ON SELF-ASSESSMENT
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abo6254openalex-extracted
Psychological inoculation improves resilience against misinformation on social media
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/2756406.2756941openalex-extracted
Why Do Social Media Users Share Misinformation?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040119-094127openalex-extracted
Public Health and Online Misinformation: Challenges and Recommendations
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475304273525openalex-extracted
Performance Overconfidence: Metacognitive Effects or Misplaced Student Expectations?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614567341openalex-extracted
Small Telescopes
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617744771openalex-extracted
Subjective Confidence Predicts Information Seeking in Decision Making
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620939054openalex-extracted
Fighting COVID-19 Misinformation on Social Media: Experimental Evidence for a Scalable Accuracy-Nudge Intervention
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100612451018openalex-extracted
Misinformation and Its Correction
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1257/089533005775196732openalex-extracted
Cognitive Reflection and Decision Making
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239666openalex-extracted
Why do people spread false information online? The effects of message and viewer characteristics on self-reported likelihood of sharing social media disinformation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02openalex-extracted
lavaan : An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.26481/umagsb.2017005openalex-extracted
Estimating the Relationship between Skill and Overconfidence
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/sm3vkopenalex-extracted
How Effective Are Interventions Against Misinformation?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.32614/cran.package.dplyropenalex-extracted
dplyr: A Grammar of Data Manipulation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.32614/r.manualsopenalex-extracted
R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00009openalex-extracted
Commentary: Cognitive reflection vs. calculation in decision making
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.566790openalex-extracted
Inoculating Against Fake News About COVID-19
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.603225openalex-extracted
Dunning-Kruger Effect: Intuitive Errors Predict Overconfidence on the Cognitive Reflection Test
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.37016//mr-2020-008openalex-extracted
Prebunking interventions based on the psychological theory of “inoculation” can reduce susceptibility to misinformation across cultures.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-013-0339-0openalex-extracted
Reducing reliance on inaccurate information
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003176831-5openalex-extracted
The Ineffectiveness of Fact-Checking Labels on News Memes and Articles
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5406/amerjpsyc.133.4.0473openalex-extracted
You Are Right, You Are Wrong: The Effect of Feedback on Intuitive Thinking
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/13367.001.0001openalex-extracted
The Bias That Divides Us: The Science and Politics of Myside Thinking
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1121openalex-snapshot
Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.254openalex-snapshot
The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.3.4.552openalex-snapshot
Knowing with certainty: The appropriateness of extreme confidence.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/h0101832openalex-snapshot
Belief in fake news is associated with delusionality, dogmatism, religious fundamentalism, and reduced analytic thinking.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/zmpduopenalex-snapshot
Prominent Misinformation Interventions Reduce Misperceptions but Increase Skepticism
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.