On the public citation graph

Do Female Experts Face an Authority Gap? Evidence from Economics

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4874980
0 signed · 35 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.
Claim with ORCID
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.
See reference health

What this work says

Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2021.102653openalex-extracted
Discrimination from below: Experimental evidence from Ethiopia
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2021.06.040openalex-extracted
Uncovering gender bias in attitudes towards financial advisors
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2006.04.011openalex-extracted
Patient perceptions of emergency physicians: The gender gap still exists
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(18)32611-4openalex-extracted
Are gender gaps due to evaluations of the applicant or the science? A natural experiment at a national funding agency
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018204openalex-extracted
Agentic women and communal leadership: How role prescriptions confer advantage to top women leaders.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000348openalex-extracted
Field-specific ability beliefs as an explanation for gender differences in academics’ career trajectories: Evidence from public profiles on ORCID.Org.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1211286109openalex-extracted
Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1314788111openalex-extracted
How stereotypes impair women’s careers in science
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1800097115openalex-extracted
Patient–physician gender concordance and increased mortality among female heart attack patients
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2024.2324014openalex-extracted
The future might be female: how does the public perceive experts?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1086/684629openalex-extracted
Economists and Public Opinion: Expert Consensus and Economic Policy Judgments
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1086/711401openalex-extracted
Gender Differences in Recognition for Group Work
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/ej/uead045openalex-extracted
Gender Differences in Reference Letters: Evidence from the Economics Job Market
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/jeea/jvx057openalex-extracted
Gender Bias in Teaching Evaluations
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjw029openalex-extracted
Stereotypes*
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhy082openalex-extracted
Birds of a Feather: The Impact of Homophily on the Propensity to Follow Financial Advice
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwu017openalex-extracted
Do economists make policies? On the political effects of economics
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/spsr.12554openalex-extracted
Do Citizens Judge Health Experts Through a Partisan Lens? Evidence from a Factorial Survey Experiment
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.economics.102308.124309openalex-extracted
Persuasion: Empirical Evidence
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/00031224221087374openalex-extracted
Gender in the Markets for Expertise
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662515621470openalex-extracted
Gendered use of experts in the media: Analysis of the gender gap in Finnish news journalism
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/19401612211025499openalex-extracted
No Gender Bias in Audience Perceptions of Male and Female Experts in the News: Equally Competent and Persuasive
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.103.3.629openalex-extracted
Views among Economists: Professional Consensus or Point-Counterpoint?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.103.3.636openalex-extracted
Economic Experts versus Average Americans
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20171829openalex-extracted
The Dynamics of Discrimination: Theory and Evidence
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20181446openalex-extracted
Does Diversity Matter for Health? Experimental Evidence from Oakland
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20221413openalex-extracted
The Gender Gap in Confidence: Expected but Not Accounted For
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.20211658openalex-extracted
Designing Information Provision Experiments
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1257/pandp.20211086openalex-extracted
Confidence Men? Evidence on Confidence and Gender among Top Economists
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.17159/sajs.2022/12480openalex-extracted
Expert voices in South African mass media during the COVID-19 pandemic
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3795012openalex-extracted
Gender and the Dynamics of Economics Seminars
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3386/w29275openalex-extracted
Diverse Policy Committees Can Reach Underrepresented Groups
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci6010029openalex-extracted
Gender in Engineering Departments: Are There Gender Differences in Interruptions of Academic Job Talks?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2479439openalex-snapshot
Economists and Public Opinion: Expert Consensus and Economic Policy Judgments
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3386/w28494openalex-snapshot
Gender and the Dynamics of Economics Seminars
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.