On the public citation graph

West Virginia Forest Landowners’ Preferences for Forest Carbon Offset Programs

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4882960
0 signed · 35 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.
Claim with ORCID
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.
See reference health

What this work says

Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-017-0918-0openalex-snapshot
The Willingness of Non-Industrial Private Forest Owners to Enter California’s Carbon Offset Market
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-009-9572-8openalex-snapshot
Biological carbon sequestration and carbon trading re-visited
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.08.027openalex-snapshot
Barriers to Massachusetts forest landowner participation in carbon markets
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.06.018openalex-snapshot
Conflicting objectives in production forests pose a challenge for forest management
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2008.10.005openalex-snapshot
Determinants of private forest management decisions: A study on West Virginia NIPF landowners
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2012.09.009openalex-snapshot
An assessment of forest landowner interest in selling forest carbon credits in the Lake States, USA
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2015.12.004openalex-snapshot
Landowner attitudes and willingness to accept compensation from forest carbon offsets: Application of best–worst choice modeling in Florida USA
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2016.05.017openalex-snapshot
Norwegian family forest owners' willingness to participate in carbon offset programs
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2016.07.004openalex-snapshot
Evaluating non-industrial private forest landowner willingness to manage for forest carbon sequestration in the southern United States
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2022.102778openalex-snapshot
Forest carbon incentive programs for non-industrial private forests in Oregon (USA): Impacts of program design on willingness to enroll and landscape-scale program outcomes
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.05.004openalex-snapshot
Factors associated with landowner involvement in forest conservation programs in the U.S.: Implications for policy design and outreach
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1024775814723openalex-snapshot
Fractions of permanence – Squaring the cycle of sink carbon accounting
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-41242-5openalex-snapshot
Accounting for the climate benefit of temporary carbon storage in nature
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-024-01960-0openalex-snapshot
Expert review of the science underlying nature-based climate solutions
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-018-0490-xopenalex-snapshot
The exceptional value of intact forest ecosystems
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1086/269471openalex-snapshot
Using Survey Participants to Estimate the Impact of Nonparticipation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1086/709458openalex-snapshot
Accounting for Attribute Non-attendance (ANA) in Chinese Consumers’ Away-from-Home Sustainable Salmon Consumption
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/forsci/fxac026openalex-snapshot
United States Family Forest Owners’ Awareness of and Participation in Carbon Sequestration Programs: Initial Findings from the USDA Forest Service National Woodland Owner Survey
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/jofore/fvae007openalex-snapshot
Private Landowner Willingness to Manage Their Land for Carbon Sequestration in New York State
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/cjag.12129openalex-snapshot
Sustainable Urban Landscaping: Consumer Preferences and Willingness to Pay for Turfgrass Fertilizers
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.14018openalex-snapshot
Future climate risks from stress, insects and fire across US forests
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aat1869openalex-snapshot
Natural climate solutions for the United States
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aan0568openalex-snapshot
Cash for carbon: A randomized trial of payments for ecosystem services to reduce deforestation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aau6020openalex-snapshot
Landscapes that work for biodiversity and people
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1186/s13021-019-0131-yopenalex-snapshot
Optimizing sequestered carbon in forest offset programs: balancing accounting stringency and participation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1186/s40663-019-0175-1openalex-snapshot
South Carolina forestland owners’ willingness to accept compensations for carbon sequestration
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201967openalex-snapshot
Small-scale forestry and carbon offset markets: An empirical study of Vermont Current Use forest landowner willingness to accept carbon credit programs
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/1924536openalex-snapshot
On Approximating the Statistical Properties of Elasticities
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2737/fs-ru-382openalex-snapshot
Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Removals From Forest Land, Woodlands, Urban Trees, and Harvested Wood Products in the United States, 1990–2020
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2737/wo-rb-101openalex-snapshot
Greenhouse gas emissions and removals from forest land, woodlands, urban trees, and harvested wood products in the United States, 1990-2021
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3389/fclim.2021.674718openalex-snapshot
U.S. Family Forest Owners' Forest Management for Climate Adaptation: Perspectives From Extension and Outreach Specialists
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3389/ffgc.2022.933020openalex-snapshot
Crediting temporary forest carbon: Retrospective and empirical perspectives on accounting options
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3390/f10010021openalex-snapshot
Perspectives of Private Forest Owners toward Investment in Forest Carbon Offset Projects: A Case of Geumsan-Gun, South Korea
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5849/jof.11-010openalex-snapshot
Factors Affecting the Attitudes of Nonindustrial Private Forest Landowners Regarding Carbon Sequestration and Trading
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5849/jof.13-066openalex-snapshot
Effectiveness of Landowner Assistance Activities: An Examination of the USDA Forest Service's Forest Stewardship Program
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.