On the public citation graph
Improving MMA judging with consensus scoring: A Statistical analysis of MMA bouts from 2003 to 2023
0 signed · 3 inferred · view as graph
Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.
Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the
claims that are yours.
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a
known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped
badge you can embed.
What points at this work
Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-60692-2_16openalex-snapshot
Navigating Between Human and Machine-Based Evaluation: Judgment and Objectivity in Economic Games Exemplified in the Analysis of MMA Fights
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/15270025251348186openalex-snapshot
They were Robbed! Scoring by the Middlemost to Attenuate Biased Judging in Boxing
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5387214openalex-snapshot
Stubborn Scorecards: Analyzing Belief Perseverance and Group Dynamics in Mixed Martial Arts (MMA) Judging
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity
Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers
publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free
and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.