On the public citation graph
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4978208
0 signed · 44 inferred · view as graph
Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.
Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the
claims that are yours.
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a
known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped
badge you can embed.
What this work says
Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07635-5_49openalex-extracted
Improving Sustainability through Usability
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2019.102670openalex-extracted
Farm scale modelling of greenhouse gas emissions from semi-intensive suckler cow beef production
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2024.107500openalex-extracted
Can environmental traffic light warning labels reduce meat meal selection? A randomised experimental study with UK meat consumers
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2017.04.003openalex-extracted
Potentials and limitations of footprints for gauging environmental sustainability
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.10.008openalex-extracted
Generic sustainability assessment themes and the role of context: The case of Danish maize for German biogas
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.01.047openalex-extracted
Assessing sustainability at farm-level: Lessons learned from a comparison of tools in practice
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.04.071openalex-extracted
Using dietary quality scores to assess sustainability of food products and human diets: A systematic review
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2009.06.002openalex-extracted
Considering the normative, systemic and procedural dimensions in indicator-based sustainability assessments in agriculture
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2022.100624openalex-extracted
General limitations of the current approach in developing sustainable food system frameworks
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.01.003openalex-extracted
Deconstructing the ‘young farmer problem in Europe’: Towards a research agenda
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2022.04.004openalex-extracted
Stay in dairy? Exploring the relationship between farmer wellbeing and farm exit intentions
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2012.12.016openalex-extracted
Greenhouse gas emission intensities of grass silage based dairy and beef production: A systems analysis of Norwegian farms
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2021.104746openalex-extracted
The effects of progress in genetics and management on intensities of greenhouse gas emissions from Norwegian pork production
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2023.105393openalex-extracted
Choice of metrics matters—Future scenarios on milk and beef production in Norway using an LCA approach
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2024.105472openalex-extracted
Modelling of on-farm greenhouse gas emissions from dual-purpose meat and wool sheep production in different geographical regions of Norway
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.435openalex-extracted
A systematic review of life cycle sustainability assessment: Current state, methodological challenges, and implementation issues
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2018.09.005openalex-extracted
Effectiveness of sustainability labels in guiding food choices: Analysis of visibility and understanding among young adults
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.12.015openalex-extracted
Social sustainability tools and indicators for the food supply chain: A systematic literature review
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s2542-5196(20)30074-7openalex-extracted
The future of environmental sustainability labelling on food products
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/s1751731114000421openalex-extracted
Applying the ecosystem services framework to pasture-based livestock farming systems in Europe
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/s1751731118002586openalex-extracted
Review: Associations among goods, impacts and ecosystem services provided by livestock farming
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1021/es101316vopenalex-extracted
Life Cycle Assessment: Past, Present, and Future
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1021/es204163fopenalex-extracted
Limitations of Carbon Footprint as Indicator of Environmental Sustainability
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10452openalex-extracted
Solutions for a cultivated planet
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/s41538-022-00165-zopenalex-extracted
Enviroscore: normalization, weighting, and categorization algorithm to evaluate the relative environmental impact of food and drink products
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-76284-yopenalex-extracted
A new understanding and evaluation of food sustainability in six different food systems in Kenya and Bolivia
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/09064702.2013.783619openalex-extracted
Environmental life cycle assessment of cereal and bread production in Norway
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/14735903.2011.582355openalex-extracted
Learning through stakeholder involvement in the implementation of MOTIFS: an integrated assessment model for sustainable farming in Flanders
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbx003openalex-extracted
Agri-food supply chain: evolution and performance with conflicting consumer and societal demands
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/gfs.12592openalex-extracted
Farming with forages can reconnect crop and livestock operations to enhance circularity and foster ecosystem services
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/soru.12417openalex-extracted
Putting social into agricultural sustainability: Integrating assessments of quality of life and wellbeing into farm sustainability indicators
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1185383openalex-extracted
Food Security: The Challenge of Feeding 9 Billion People
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-resource-100518-094103openalex-extracted
Sustainability-Related Food Labels
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-023-01410-8openalex-extracted
Traffic-light front-of-pack environmental labelling across food categories triggers more environmentally friendly food choices: a randomised controlled trial in virtual reality supermarket
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130491openalex-extracted
The Nutrient Balance Concept: A New Quality Metric for Composite Meals and Diets
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1579/0044-7447-34.4.316openalex-extracted
Healthy and Happy: Animal Welfare as an Integral Part of Sustainable Agriculture
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rccp.324688openalex-extracted
Animal welfare: concepts, study methods and indicators
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3097/lo.201864openalex-extracted
Agroecosystem Service Capacity Index – A methodological approach
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2023091242openalex-extracted
Newtools—Developing New Tools for a Sustainable Food System, Including Two Scoring Systems for Foods on Nutritional Quality and for Environmental and Social Sustainability
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3390/su11030738openalex-extracted
Sustainability Assessment of Annual and Permanent Crops: The Inspia Model
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3390/su8030196openalex-extracted
Seven Food System Metrics of Sustainable Nutrition Security
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5751/es-06876-190346openalex-extracted
Key characteristics for tool choice in indicator-based sustainability assessment at farm level
What points at this work
Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2025.04.002openalex-snapshot
Life cycle sustainability assessment of staple food processing: A double and dynamic materiality approach
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity
Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers
publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free
and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.