On the public citation graph

How Malleable are Pro-Environmental Preferences? Evidence from a Randomized Survey Experiment

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5077490
0 signed · 31 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.
Claim with ORCID
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.
See reference health

What this work says

Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10018-016-0144-7openalex-snapshot
Effectiveness, earmarking and labeling: testing the acceptability of carbon taxes with survey data
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-012-9327-7openalex-snapshot
Self-selection and variations in the laboratory measurement of other-regarding preferences across subject pools: evidence from one college student and two adult samples
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-014-9397-9openalex-snapshot
Self-selection into laboratory experiments: pro-social motives versus monetary incentives
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2018.01.004openalex-snapshot
Congestion pricing practices and public acceptance: A review of evidence
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106496openalex-snapshot
French attitudes on climate change, carbon taxation and other climate policies
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2012.03.004openalex-snapshot
How to make the unpopular popular? Policy characteristics, social norms and the acceptability of environmental policies
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.02.013openalex-snapshot
Seepage: Climate change denial and its effect on the scientific community
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2010.10.006openalex-snapshot
Do you not like Pigou, or do you not understand him? Tax aversion and revenue recycling in the lab
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2004.09.005openalex-snapshot
On the income dependence of equivalence scales
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reseneeco.2022.101331openalex-snapshot
Understanding the resistance to carbon taxes: Drivers and barriers among the general public and fuel-tax protesters
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2009.11.005openalex-snapshot
Explaining differences in acceptability before and acceptance after the implementation of a congestion charge in Stockholm
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-4076(98)00020-7openalex-snapshot
Semiparametric estimates and tests of base-independent equivalence scales
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1743openalex-snapshot
Your opinion on climate change might not be as common as you think
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-27380-8openalex-snapshot
Carbon tax acceptability with information provision and mixed revenue uses
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0201-2openalex-snapshot
Making carbon pricing work for citizens
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1001509107openalex-snapshot
Public perceptions of energy consumption and savings
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2012.675732openalex-snapshot
To tax, or not to tax: preferences for climate policy attributes
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2018.1470963openalex-snapshot
The impact of compensatory measures on public support for carbon taxation: an experimental study in Sweden
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2019.1639490openalex-snapshot
Perceived fairness and public acceptability of carbon pricing: a review of the literature
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab81c1openalex-snapshot
Combining climate, economic, and social policy builds public support for climate action in the US
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abdae9openalex-snapshot
Does carbon pricing reduce emissions? A review of ex-post analyses
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/1070496512442508openalex-snapshot
The Promise and Problems of Pricing Carbon
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.101.1.81openalex-snapshot
The Problem of the Commons: Still Unsettled After 100 Years
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20171330openalex-snapshot
Measuring and Bounding Experimenter Demand
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.99.3.667openalex-snapshot
Distributional and Efficiency Impacts of Increased US Gasoline Taxes
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.20211658openalex-snapshot
Designing Information Provision Experiments
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1257/mac.20210052openalex-snapshot
The Macroeconomic Impact of Europe’s Carbon Taxes
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1257/pandp.20201081openalex-snapshot
Measuring the Macroeconomic Impact of Carbon Taxes
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.20200092openalex-snapshot
Yellow Vests, Pessimistic Beliefs, and Carbon Tax Aversion
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1509/jppm.16.118openalex-snapshot
Understanding Effectiveness Skepticism
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1987487openalex-snapshot
The Promise and Problems of Pricing Carbon: Theory and Experience
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.