On the public citation graph
Go to Extremes: Why Participation in Crowdsourcing Contests May Not Increase with the Reward
0 signed · 70 inferred · view as graph
Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.
Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the
claims that are yours.
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a
known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped
badge you can embed.
What this work says
Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470752937.ch6openalex-snapshot
Walking with the Scarecrow: The Information‐Processing Approach to Decision Research
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118900772.etrds0159openalex-snapshot
Heuristic Decision Making
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/joom.1132openalex-snapshot
Is a large award truly attractive to solvers? The impact of award size on crowd size in innovation contests
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1015openalex-snapshot
Expectancy–Value Theory of Achievement Motivation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-7964-1_2openalex-snapshot
Alternatives to Expected Utility: Formal Theories
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00124422openalex-snapshot
Efficient rents 2 free entry and efficient rent seeking
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02283523openalex-snapshot
An overview of lexicographic choice under uncertainty
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s00182-014-0435-9openalex-snapshot
Contests with endogenous entry
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-009-0463-zopenalex-snapshot
The optimal multi-stage contest
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-010-0544-zopenalex-snapshot
Endogenous entry in contests
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-014-9421-0openalex-snapshot
A survey of experimental research on contests, all-pay auctions and tournaments
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-013-9393-0openalex-snapshot
Axiomatizing bounded rationality: the priority heuristic
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-012-0093-3openalex-snapshot
Factors affecting participation of solvers in crowdsourcing: an empirical study from China
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-017-0252-7openalex-snapshot
Exploring the effects of reward and competition intensity on participation in crowdsourcing contests
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2019.07.001openalex-snapshot
Entry in contests with incomplete information: Theory and experiments
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2017.10.021openalex-snapshot
Monetary and non-monetary incentives in real-effort tournaments
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2018.02.024openalex-snapshot
Experimental methods: Measuring effort in economics experiments
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2014.12.002openalex-snapshot
Problem‐solving effort and success in innovation contests: The role of national wealth and national culture
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2010.05.006openalex-snapshot
Entry into winner-take-all and proportional-prize contests: An experimental study
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102644openalex-snapshot
Is self-knowledge the ultimate prize? A quantitative analysis of participation choice in online ideation crowdsourcing contests
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2017.02.001openalex-snapshot
Solvers’ participation in crowdsourcing platforms: Examining the impacts of trust, and benefit and cost factors
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2014.06.003openalex-snapshot
An overall probability of winning heuristic for complex risky decisions: Choice and eye fixation evidence
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s0014-2921(98)00008-7openalex-snapshot
Definable preferences: An example
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/s193029750000173xopenalex-snapshot
Compensatory versus noncompensatory models for predicting consumer preferences
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.103.4.650openalex-snapshot
Reasoning the fast and frugal way: Models of bounded rationality.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.109.1.75openalex-snapshot
Models of ecological rationality: The recognition heuristic.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.113.2.409openalex-snapshot
The priority heuristic: Making choices without trade-offs.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037025openalex-snapshot
From perception to preference and on to inference: An approach–avoidance analysis of thresholds.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000174openalex-snapshot
The truth about lies: A meta-analysis on dishonest behavior.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929x.2021.1880638openalex-snapshot
Social mechanisms in crowdsourcing contests: a literature review
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2024.2415766openalex-snapshot
Driving the Innovation Race: Effect of Competitiveness in Crowdsourcing Contest
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1086/261010openalex-snapshot
Rank-Order Tournaments as Optimum Labor Contracts
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1109/tse.2017.2774297openalex-snapshot
Competition-Based Crowdsourcing Software Development: A Multi-Method Study from a Customer Perspective
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/1756-2171.12121openalex-snapshot
Performance responses to competition across skill levels in rank‐order tournaments: field evidence and implications for tournament design
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/1756-2171.12325openalex-snapshot
Markets for ideas: prize structure, entry limits, and the design of ideation contests
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-2171.2009.00087.xopenalex-snapshot
Competition among contests
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.12552openalex-snapshot
Heterogeneous Submission Behavior and its Implications for Success in Innovation Contests with Public Submissions
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.13340openalex-snapshot
Attracting High‐Quality Contestants to Contest in the Context of Crowdsourcing Contest Platform
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/1386790.1386829openalex-snapshot
Crowdsourcing and knowledge sharing
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/1566374.1566392openalex-snapshot
Crowdsourcing and all-pay auctions
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.28.020177.000245openalex-snapshot
Behavioral Decision Theory
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.32.020181.000413openalex-snapshot
Behavioral Decision Theory: Processes of Judgement and Choice
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1257/000282803322157025openalex-snapshot
Optimal Design of Research Contests
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.91.3.542openalex-snapshot
The Optimal Allocation of Prizes in Contests
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2017.0767openalex-snapshot
A Structural Analysis of the Role of Superstars in Crowdsourcing Contests
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2023.1232openalex-snapshot
An Examination of the Dynamics of Crowdsourcing Contests: Role of Feedback Type
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1110.1322openalex-snapshot
Incentives and Problem Uncertainty in Innovation Contests: An Empirical Analysis
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.20.11.1442openalex-snapshot
Exceptional Paper—Lexicographic Orders, Utilities and Decision Rules: A Survey
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2013.1845openalex-snapshot
Crowdsourcing with All-Pay Auctions: A Field Experiment on Taskcn
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2019.3488openalex-snapshot
Information Disclosure in Contests With Endogenous Entry: An Experiment
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2021.4111openalex-snapshot
The Role of Participation in Innovation Contests
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2021.4140openalex-snapshot
The Role of Feedback in Dynamic Crowdsourcing Contests: A Structural Empirical Analysis
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2022.4397openalex-snapshot
Explaining Excess Entry in Winner-Take-All Markets
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2022.4447openalex-snapshot
Choice with Affirmative Action
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1090.0491openalex-snapshot
Marginality and Problem-Solving Effectiveness in Broadcast Search
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.294openalex-snapshot
When Cheating is an Honest Mistake: A Critical Evaluation of the Matrix Task as a Measure of Dishonesty
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00787openalex-snapshot
Why and How Online Experiments Can Benefit Information Systems Research
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2780503openalex-snapshot
Markets for Ideas: Prize Structure, Entry Limits, and the Design of Ideation Contests
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185openalex-snapshot
Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2393228openalex-snapshot
The Incentive Effects of Tournament Compensation Systems
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.24251/hicss.2020.023openalex-snapshot
Crowdsourcing Contests: Understanding the Effect of Environment and Organization Specific Factors on Sustained Participation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.25300/misq/2018/14103openalex-snapshot
Know When to Run: Recommendations in Crowdsourcing Contests1
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.25300/misq/2019/13649openalex-snapshot
Managing the Crowds: The Effect of Prize Guarantees and In-Process Feedback on Participation in Crowdsourcing Contests1
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.25300/misq/2021/14639openalex-snapshot
Competing Tasks and Task Quality: An Empirical Study of Crowdsourcing Contests
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2753/jec1086-4415150402openalex-snapshot
Task Design, Motivation, and Participation in Crowdsourcing Contests
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity
Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers
publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free
and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.