On the public citation graph

Acceptance of Sharing Rules and the Promotion of Energy Communities: A Comparative Analysis

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5176737
0 signed · 29 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.
Claim with ORCID
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.
See reference health

What this work says

Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1006/game.1997.0511openalex-snapshot
Strategy-Proof Allotment Rules
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.08.136openalex-snapshot
Optimization problem for meeting distribution system operator requests in local flexibility markets with distributed energy resources
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.02.089openalex-snapshot
Evaluation of peer-to-peer energy sharing mechanisms based on a multiagent simulation framework
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.03.010openalex-snapshot
Peer-to-Peer energy trading in a Microgrid
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.118053openalex-snapshot
Business Models for Peer-to-Peer Energy Trading in Germany Based on Households’ Beliefs and Preferences
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.09.003openalex-snapshot
Comparative review and discussion on P2P electricity trading
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2023.113645openalex-snapshot
Peer-to-peer trading price and strategy optimization considering different electricity market types, tariff systems, and pricing models
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2011.06.015openalex-snapshot
Modeling methods for GenCo bidding strategy optimization in the liberalized electricity spot market–A state-of-the-art review
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.124246openalex-snapshot
Virtual net-billing: A fair energy sharing method for collective self-consumption
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2020.06.002openalex-snapshot
State-of-the-Art Analysis and Perspectives for Peer-to-Peer Energy Trading
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.111098openalex-snapshot
Becoming prosumer: Revealing trading preferences and decision-making strategies in peer-to-peer energy communities
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2022.112808openalex-snapshot
Stakeholder objectives for joining an energy community: Flemish case studies
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2022.108907openalex-snapshot
Peer-to-peer energy trading in smart grid: Frameworks, implementation methodologies, and demonstration projects
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2023.108687openalex-snapshot
A value sharing method for heterogeneous energy communities archetypes
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jet.2015.08.008openalex-snapshot
Priority classes and weighted constrained equal awards rules for the claims problem
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.03.040openalex-snapshot
Microgrids: A review of technologies, key drivers, and outstanding issues
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112419openalex-snapshot
Pricing decisions in peer-to-peer and prosumer-centred electricity markets: Experimental analysis in Germany and the United Kingdom
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112859openalex-snapshot
Energy-sharing mechanisms for energy community members under different asset ownership schemes and user demand profiles
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2023.113273openalex-snapshot
Emerging business models in local energy markets: A systematic review of peer-to-peer, community self-consumption, and transactive energy models
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108161107openalex-snapshot
How to Divide When There Isn't Enough
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-gtd.2018.5309openalex-snapshot
Market framework for local energy trading: a review of potential designs and market clearing approaches
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0262.00126openalex-snapshot
Priority Rules and Other Asymmetric Rationing Methods
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-080218-025559openalex-snapshot
Fair Division in the Internet Age
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1515/itit-2019-0016openalex-snapshot
Tracing local energy markets: A literature review
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4032760openalex-snapshot
Emerging Business Models in Local Energy Markets: A Systematic Review of Peer-To-Peer, Community Self-Consumption, and Transactive Energy Models
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4917846openalex-snapshot
Power Trading within an Energy Community Applying the Weighted Constrained Equal Awards
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3390/en12193709openalex-snapshot
Peer-to-Peer Energy Trading of a Community Connected with an AC and DC Microgrid
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3982/te5111openalex-snapshot
All sequential allotment rules are obviously strategy‐proof
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3597433openalex-snapshot
Business models for prosumers in Europe
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.