On the public citation graph
"Effort-Boosting" Momentum Effect in Repeated Competitions
0 signed · 46 inferred · view as graph
Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.
Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the
claims that are yours.
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a
known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped
badge you can embed.
What this work says
Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1006/game.1997.0517openalex-snapshot
On the Existence and Uniqueness of Pure Nash Equilibrium in Rent-Seeking Games
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-79247-5_18openalex-snapshot
Rigging the lobbying process: An application of the all-pay auction
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-009-0463-zopenalex-snapshot
The optimal multi-stage contest
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-011-0657-zopenalex-snapshot
Effort maximization in asymmetric contest games with heterogeneous contestants
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-014-0835-xopenalex-snapshot
Mixed equilibria in Tullock contests
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-024-01557-wopenalex-snapshot
Momentum in contests and its underlying behavioral mechanisms
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2010.01.013openalex-snapshot
Information feedback in a dynamic tournament
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2012.04.005openalex-snapshot
Favoritism in asymmetric contests: Head starts and handicaps
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2016.02.003openalex-snapshot
Biased contests for symmetric players
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2017.07.003openalex-snapshot
Contests with small noise and the robustness of the all-pay auction
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2022.07.005openalex-snapshot
Biasing dynamic contests between ex-ante symmetric players
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2024.04.006openalex-snapshot
Winner's effort in multi-battle team contests
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2010.03.020openalex-snapshot
Optimal tournament contracts for heterogeneous workers
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jet.2023.105765openalex-snapshot
Optimal prize design in team contests with pairwise battles
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2005.08.009openalex-snapshot
Primaries and the New Hampshire Effect
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2010.09.012openalex-snapshot
Political culture and discrimination in contests
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2011.01.009openalex-snapshot
Double-edged transparency in teams
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2011.07.002openalex-snapshot
Incumbency advantage and political campaign spending limits
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2018.03.003openalex-snapshot
How to split the pie: Optimal rewards in dynamic multi-battle competitions
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1086/656669openalex-snapshot
Interim Performance Feedback in Multistage Tournaments: The Optimality of Partial Disclosure
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1086/705670openalex-snapshot
Turning Up the Heat: The Discouraging Effect of Competition in Contests
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1086/711762openalex-snapshot
Dynamic Tournament Design: Evidence from Prediction Contests
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/ej/ueaf005openalex-snapshot
Fighting for Lemons: The Balancing Effect of Private Information on Incentives in Dynamic Contests
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/ej/uez040openalex-snapshot
Does Success Breed Success? a Quasi-Experiment on Strategic Momentum in Dynamic Contests
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdae001openalex-snapshot
Voluntary Disclosure in Asymmetric Contests
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/ecoj.12277openalex-snapshot
Information Disclosure in Contests: A Bayesian Persuasion Approach
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9779.2009.01431.xopenalex-snapshot
Tournaments of Weakly Heterogeneous Players
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2354.2012.00720.xopenalex-snapshot
PEER TRANSPARENCY IN TEAMS: DOES IT HELP OR HINDER INCENTIVES?*
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-2171.2010.00109.xopenalex-snapshot
Transparency and incentives among peers
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_00021openalex-snapshot
Testing Contest Theory: Evidence from Best-of-Three Tennis Matches
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1257/000282803322157025openalex-snapshot
Optimal Design of Research Contests
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.91.3.542openalex-snapshot
The Optimal Allocation of Prizes in Contests
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1257/mic.20200071openalex-snapshot
Two-Stage Contests with Private Information
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1257/mic.20200230openalex-snapshot
Disclosure and Favoritism in Sequential Elimination Contests
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2021.4206openalex-snapshot
To Fight or to Give Up? Dynamic Contests with a Deadline
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1868823openalex-snapshot
Political Culture and Discrimination in Contests
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4134568openalex-snapshot
Ridge Distributions and Information Design in Simultaneous All-Pay Auction Contests
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4509403openalex-snapshot
Ridge Distributions and Information Design in Simultaneous All-Pay Auction Contests
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3386/w1668openalex-snapshot
Prizes and Incentives in Elimination Tournaments
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3982/te3672openalex-snapshot
On the optimal design of biased contests
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3982/te4259openalex-snapshot
Optimal contests with incomplete information and convex effort costs
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity
Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers
publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free
and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.