On the public citation graph
Let's Talk: The Effects of Virtual Financial Advisor Interaction Mode and Gender Expression on Investor Judgments
0 signed · 43 inferred · view as graph
Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.
Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the
claims that are yours.
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a
known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped
badge you can embed.
What this work says
Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21480openalex-snapshot
The most human bot: Female gendering increases humanness perceptions of bots and acceptance of AI
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10693-021-00367-8openalex-snapshot
Investor Characteristics and their Impact on the Decision to use a Robo-advisor
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-020-09539-8openalex-snapshot
Using video to disclose forward-looking information: the effect of nonverbal cues on investors’ judgments
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-018-0502-7openalex-snapshot
The Social Perception of Humanoid and Non-Humanoid Robots: Effects of Gendered and Machinelike Features
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2018.03.009openalex-snapshot
Firm communication and investor response: A framework and discussion integrating social media
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107321openalex-snapshot
Deep mind in social responses to technologies: A new approach to explaining the Computers are Social Actors phenomena
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2020.101681openalex-snapshot
The effects of social bias against female analysts on markets
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.11.009openalex-snapshot
Reliance on individuating information and stereotypes in implicit and explicit person perception
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s0361-3682(01)00011-3openalex-snapshot
Experimental research in financial accounting
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.54.7.462openalex-snapshot
The unbearable automaticity of being.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.3.416openalex-snapshot
Penalties for Success: Reactions to Women Who Succeed at Male Gender-Typed Tasks.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.777openalex-snapshot
When fit is fundamental: Performance evaluations and promotions of upper-level female and male managers.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.72.3.544openalex-snapshot
Gender- and race-based standards of competence: Lower minimum standards but higher ability standards for devalued groups.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.111.2.256openalex-snapshot
Thin slices of expressive behavior as predictors of interpersonal consequences: A meta-analysis.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036751openalex-snapshot
Gender and perceptions of leadership effectiveness: A meta-analysis of contextual moderators.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000494openalex-snapshot
Gender stereotypes have changed: A cross-temporal meta-analysis of U.S. public opinion polls from 1946 to 2018.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/h0024833openalex-snapshot
The contribution of studies of source credibility to a theory of interpersonal trust in the communication process.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000986openalex-snapshot
Toward an optimized measure of perceived partner responsiveness: Development and validation of the perceived responsiveness and insensitivity scale.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000214openalex-snapshot
Mistaking minds and machines: How speech affects dehumanization and anthropomorphism.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1086/716290openalex-snapshot
What Have We Learned about Gender from Candidate Choice Experiments? A Meta-Analysis of Sixty-Seven Factorial Survey Experiments
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2018.0571openalex-snapshot
The Effects of Modality, Device, and Task Differences on Perceived Human Likeness of Voice-Activated Virtual Assistants
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2018.0581openalex-snapshot
Effects of Gender and Relationship Type on the Response to Artificial Intelligence
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00153openalex-snapshot
Machines and Mindlessness: Social Responses to Computers
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12641openalex-snapshot
The Effect of Humanizing Robo‐Advisors on Investor Judgments*
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12898openalex-snapshot
To read or to listen? Does disclosure delivery mode impact investors' reactions to managers' tone language?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12962openalex-snapshot
CEO gender and responses to shareholder activism
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1997.tb00275.xopenalex-snapshot
Are Machines Gender Neutral? Gender‐Stereotypic Responses to Computers With Voices
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1162/coli.2006.32.3.451openalex-snapshot
Wired for Speech: How Voice Activates and Advances the Human-Computer Relationship
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167293191010openalex-snapshot
Stereotypes and the Construal of Individuating Information
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2021.1550openalex-snapshot
He’s Overqualified, She’s Highly Committed: Qualification Signals and Gendered Assumptions About Job Candidate Commitment
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2008.26.2.143openalex-snapshot
When We Need A Human: Motivational Determinants of Anthropomorphism
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3036722openalex-snapshot
Are Robots Good Fiduciaries? Regulating Robo-Advisors Under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-52621openalex-snapshot
Investor Preference for Director Characteristics: Portfolio Choice with Gender Bias
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2005.80.2.723openalex-snapshot
The Fleeting Effects of Disclosure Forthcomingness on Management's Reporting Credibility
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2308/bria-2023-017openalex-snapshot
Does Temporal Immediacy Impact Investors’ Judgments? It Depends on Communication Mode
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2308/tar-2018-0715openalex-snapshot
Penalties for Unexpected Behavior: Double Standards for Women in Finance
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2308/tar-2019-1001openalex-snapshot
Theory Testing and Process Evidence in Accounting Experiments
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2308/tar-2021-0551openalex-snapshot
Nonprofessional Investor Judgments: Linking Dependent Measures to Constructs
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.30658/hmc.1.5openalex-snapshot
Building a Stronger CASA: Extending the Computers Are Social Actors Paradigm
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.30658/hmc.2.2openalex-snapshot
Social Responses to Media Technologies in the 21st Century: The Media are Social Actors Paradigm
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3200/socp.144.2.149-162openalex-snapshot
Estimates of Emotional and Psychometric Intelligence: Evidence for Gender-Based Stereotypes
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00011openalex-snapshot
The Multiple Dimensions of Gender Stereotypes: A Current Look at Men’s and Women’s Characterizations of Others and Themselves
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.71183/supra.2026030301openalex-snapshot
Conflicts of Interest Associated with the Use of Predictive Data Analytics by Broker-Dealers and Investment Advisers
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity
Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers
publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free
and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.