On the public citation graph

Natural Capital Accounting for Non-Market Values Identified by Indigenous Valuation

0 signed · 17 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.

Claim with ORCID

Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.

See reference health

What this work says

Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9202-2_5openalex-snapshot

A Habitat-Classification Framework and Typology for Understanding, Valuing, and Managing Invasive Species Impacts

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0465-2_10openalex-snapshot

Indigenous Knowledge and Traditional Knowledge

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.11.025openalex-snapshot

Australia's Genuine Progress Indicator Revisited (1962–2013)

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106858openalex-snapshot

From landscape practices to ecosystem services: Landscape valuation in Indigenous contexts

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.09.017openalex-snapshot

Citizen science for assessing ecosystem services: Status, challenges and opportunities

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100947openalex-snapshot

Applying the natural capital approach to decision making for the marine environment

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2022.101419openalex-snapshot

Incorporating citizen science to advance the Natural Capital approach

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2022.100753openalex-snapshot

Indigenous culture and nature relatedness: Results from a collaborative study

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.12.011openalex-snapshot

The relevance of the ecosystem services framework for developed countries’ environmental policies: A comparative case study of the US and EU

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2020.07.006openalex-snapshot

Science Must Embrace Traditional and Indigenous Knowledge to Solve Our Biodiversity Crisis

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316677117.041openalex-snapshot

United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, 2007

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-0552-3openalex-snapshot

The natural capital framework for sustainably efficient and equitable decision making

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/srep33051openalex-snapshot

Patterns of contribution to citizen science biodiversity projects increase understanding of volunteers’ recording behaviour

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01149-wopenalex-snapshot

Ecosystem accounting and the need to recognise Indigenous perspectives

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/20964129.2019.1682470openalex-snapshot

Natural capital accounting perspectives: a pragmatic way forward

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biw026openalex-snapshot

The Importance of Indigenous Knowledge in Curbing the Loss of Language and Biodiversity

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923x.12869openalex-snapshot

Deliberation, Citizen Science and Covid‐19

Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.