On the public citation graph

Stated Preference During the Polling Crisis: Errors, Trade-Offs, and Modelling Approaches

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5258503
0 signed · 49 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.
Claim with ORCID
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.
See reference health

What this work says

Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/aepp.13352openalex-snapshot
Estimating the benefits to Florida households from avoiding another Gulf oil spill using the contingent valuation method: Internal validity tests with probability‐based and opt‐in samples
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/aepp.13374openalex-snapshot
Hypothetical bias mitigation in representative and convenience samples
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/aepp.13375openalex-snapshot
Comparing water quality valuation across probability and non‐probability samples
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-007-9124-5openalex-snapshot
Incentive and informational properties of preference questions
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-015-9876-2openalex-snapshot
Investigating Internet and Mail Implementation of Stated-Preference Surveys While Controlling for Differences in Sample Frames
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-018-00311-wopenalex-snapshot
Spatial Dimensions of Stated Preference Valuation in Environmental and Resource Economics: Methods, Trends and Challenges
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-023-00788-0openalex-snapshot
Biodiversity Benefits of Birdwatching Using Citizen Science Data and Individualized Recreational Demand Models
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106390openalex-snapshot
Smartphone and tablet effects in contingent valuation web surveys – No reason to worry?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2022.101420openalex-snapshot
A tale of two samples: Understanding WTP differences in the age of social media
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2014.06.001openalex-snapshot
Forecasting elections with non-representative polls
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2005.12.003openalex-snapshot
Is hypothetical bias universal? Validating contingent valuation responses using a binding public referendum
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2018.08.010openalex-snapshot
Strategic bias in discrete choice experiments
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s0095-0696(02)00010-4openalex-snapshot
Analysis of contingent valuation data with multiple bids and response options allowing respondents to express uncertainty
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/9780511843839openalex-snapshot
A Course in Environmental Economics
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/bca.2017.9openalex-snapshot
Valuing Ecological Improvements in the Chesapeake Bay and the Importance of Ancillary Benefits
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2018.7openalex-snapshot
The Twilight of the Polls? A Review of Trends in Polling Accuracy and the Causes of Polling Misses
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022381611001204openalex-snapshot
How Should We Measure District-Level Public Opinion on Individual Issues?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/538304aopenalex-snapshot
The polling crisis: How to tell what people really think
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2015.1008626openalex-snapshot
Correcting for non-response bias in contingent valuation surveys concerning environmental non-market goods: an empirical investigation using an online panel
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/21606544.2017.1284695openalex-snapshot
Systematic non-response in discrete choice experiments: implications for the valuation of climate risk reductions
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/21606544.2017.1322537openalex-snapshot
Re-examining empirical evidence on stated preferences: importance of incentive compatibility
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1086/676450openalex-snapshot
Consequentiality: A Theoretical and Experimental Exploration of a Single Binary Choice
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1086/691697openalex-snapshot
Contemporary Guidance for Stated Preference Studies
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1086/714777openalex-snapshot
Improved Multilevel Regression with Poststratification through Machine Learning (autoMrP)
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1086/721995openalex-snapshot
Revisiting the Gap between the Willingness to Pay and Willingness to Accept for Public Goods
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1086/731527openalex-snapshot
Information Scripts and the Incentive Compatibility of Discrete Choice Experiments
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1086/731886openalex-snapshot
Mitigating Cost-Vector Effects in Stated Choice Experiments Using Cheap Talk and Opt-Out Reminders
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwaa053openalex-snapshot
Multilevel Regression and Poststratification Versus Survey Sample Weighting for Estimating Population Quantities in Large Population Health Studies
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smt008openalex-snapshot
Summary Report of the AAPOR Task Force on Non-probability Sampling
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mph024openalex-snapshot
Bayesian Multilevel Estimation with Poststratification: State-Level Estimates from National Polls
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpr034openalex-snapshot
Estimating Constituency Preferences from Sparse Survey Data Using Auxiliary Geographic Information
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfq058openalex-snapshot
Total Survey Error: Design, Implementation, and Evaluation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfx047openalex-snapshot
An Evaluation of the 2016 Election Polls in the United States
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/reep/reaa001openalex-snapshot
Best Practices for Using Hedonic Property Value Models to Measure Willingness to Pay for Environmental Quality
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/ajae.12268openalex-snapshot
Using inferred valuation to quantify survey and social desirability bias in stated preference research
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12319openalex-snapshot
Extending the Use and Prediction Precision of Subnational Public Opinion Estimation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/cjag.12304openalex-snapshot
Six decades of environmental resource valuation in Canada: A synthesis of the literature
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6419.2010.00675.xopenalex-snapshot
WHAT'S TO KNOW ABOUT HYPOTHETICAL BIAS IN STATED PREFERENCE VALUATION STUDIES?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2008.00360.xopenalex-snapshot
How Should We Estimate Public Opinion in The States?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aam8124openalex-snapshot
Putting a value on injuries to natural assets: The BP oil spill
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1215/00182702-3876493openalex-snapshot
“Fraught with Controversy”: Organizing Expertise against Contingent Valuation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.26.4.3openalex-snapshot
From Exxon to BP: Has Some Number Become Better than No Number?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.26.4.43openalex-snapshot
Contingent Valuation: From Dubious to Hopeless
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1257/mic.4.4.145openalex-snapshot
Truth in Consequentiality: Theory and Field Evidence on Discrete Choice Experiments
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v076.i01openalex-snapshot
Stan : A Probabilistic Programming Language
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2959427openalex-snapshot
Constructing Markets: Environmental Economics and the Contingent Valuation Controversy
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.276497openalex-snapshot
Warm Glow, Good Feelings, and Contingent Valuation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3368/le.98.1.040720-0050r1openalex-snapshot
Using Auxiliary Population Samples for Sample-Selection Correction in Models Based on Crowd-Sourced Volunteered Geographic Information
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.4337/9781786434692openalex-snapshot
Contingent Valuation of Environmental Goods
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.