On the public citation graph

Five Years of Offsetting Native Vegetation: Risks, Uncertainties and Challenges for Achieving No-Net-Loss

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5263701
0 signed · 39 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.
Claim with ORCID
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.
See reference health

What this work says

Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.1970openalex-snapshot
Modeling biodiversity benchmarks in variable environments
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.2496openalex-snapshot
Quantifying the “avoided” biodiversity impacts associated with economic development
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-020-01415-0openalex-snapshot
When is an Offset Not an Offset? A Framework of Necessary Conditions for Biodiversity Offsets
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2018.09.002openalex-snapshot
Fifteen operationally important decisions in the planning of biodiversity offsets
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.06.036openalex-snapshot
Biodiversity offsetting: Certainty of the net loss but uncertainty of the net gain
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108250openalex-snapshot
What are we measuring? A review of metrics used to describe biodiversity in offsets exchanges
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109117openalex-snapshot
Compensating for lost nature values through biodiversity offsetting – Where is the evidence?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107341openalex-snapshot
A new Vegetation Integrity metric for trading losses and gains in terrestrial biodiversity value
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2019.10.019openalex-snapshot
The Role of “No Net Loss” Policies in Conserving Biodiversity Threatened by the Global Infrastructure Boom
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2020.12.012openalex-snapshot
Governing for “no net loss” of biodiversity over the long term: challenges and pathways forward
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2022.05.011openalex-snapshot
Credible biodiversity offsetting needs public national registers to confirm no net loss
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2003.10.005openalex-snapshot
Alternative states and positive feedbacks in restoration ecology
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/s003060531200172xopenalex-snapshot
Biodiversity offsets in theory and practice
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/s0030605315000782openalex-snapshot
Biodiversity offsetting and conservation: reframing nature to save it
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/s0030605319000528openalex-snapshot
Improving averted loss estimates for better biodiversity outcomes from offset exchanges
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-023-02199-2openalex-snapshot
‘Nature positive’ must incorporate, not undermine, the mitigation hierarchy
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-018-0176-zopenalex-snapshot
The global extent of biodiversity offset implementation under no net loss policies
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-00636-9openalex-snapshot
The politics of biodiversity offsetting across time and institutional scales
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-022-00850-7openalex-snapshot
On track to achieve no net loss of forest at Madagascar’s biggest mine
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/26395916.2020.1862914openalex-snapshot
Distributive and contextual equity in landholder participation in biodiversity offsets: a case study of biodiversity offsets in New South Wales, Australia
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/acd8cfopenalex-snapshot
Matching problems in biodiversity offset markets: a case study of the New South Wales biodiversity offsets scheme
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biw038openalex-snapshot
Taming a Wicked Problem: Resolving Controversies in Biodiversity Offsetting
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12398openalex-snapshot
FORUM: Perverse incentives risk undermining biodiversity offset policies
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12726openalex-snapshot
Seeking convergence on the key concepts in ‘no net loss’ policy
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210x.12287openalex-snapshot
A method for calculating minimum biodiversity offset multipliers accounting for time discounting, additionality and permanence
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12778openalex-snapshot
How economics can further the success of ecological restoration
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12206openalex-snapshot
A Loss-Gain Calculator for Biodiversity Offsets and the Circumstances in Which No Net Loss Is Feasible
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12335openalex-snapshot
Implementation Gap between the Theory and Practice of Biodiversity Offset Multipliers
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12709openalex-snapshot
Achieving cost‐effective landscape‐scale forest restoration through targeted natural regeneration
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.13070openalex-snapshot
Evaluation of averted loss gains under Victorian biodiversity offset policy
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/emr.12602openalex-snapshot
Does the NSW vegetation integrity assessment underestimate the conservation values of derived native grasslands?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.16801openalex-snapshot
Evaluating the impact of biodiversity offsetting on native vegetation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01420.xopenalex-snapshot
Integrating ecological uncertainty and farm‐scale economics when planning restoration
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.13346openalex-snapshot
Barriers to ecological restoration in Europe: expert perspectives
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.13429openalex-snapshot
Australian native seed sector practice and behavior could limit ecological restoration success: further insights from the Australian Native Seed Report
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aax3100openalex-snapshot
Pervasive human-driven decline of life on Earth points to the need for transformative change
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002052openalex-snapshot
Optimal Conservation Outcomes Require Both Restoration and Protection
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1590/1676-0611-bn-2022-e001openalex-snapshot
The Kunming-Montréal Global Biodiversity Framework
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.32614/r.manualsopenalex-snapshot
R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.