On the public citation graph
Government Apologies and Political Stability: A Global Analysis of Crisis Communication
0 signed · 21 inferred · view as graph
Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.
Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the
claims that are yours.
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a
known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped
badge you can embed.
What this work says
Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/0363-8111(95)90024-1openalex-snapshot
Understanding cultural preferences of Arab communication patterns
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/s0043887121000083openalex-snapshot
The Impact of Political Apologies on Public Opinion
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/s1876404511200046openalex-snapshot
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Methodology and Analytical Issues
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.94.1.116openalex-snapshot
A needs-based model of reconciliation: Satisfying the differential emotional needs of victim and perpetrator as a key to promoting reconciliation.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2020.1727737openalex-snapshot
No water in the oasis: the Chilean Spring of 2019–2020
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895x.00230openalex-snapshot
From Social to Political Identity: A Critical Examination of Social Identity Theory
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12677openalex-snapshot
Political apologies and their acceptance: Experimental evidence from victims and perpetrators nations
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2008.00689.xopenalex-snapshot
Government Apologies for Historical Injustices
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2011.02052.xopenalex-snapshot
Which decision‐making arrangements generate the strongest legitimacy beliefs? Evidence from a randomised field experiment
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00533.xopenalex-snapshot
How Lasting Is Voter Gratitude? An Analysis of the Short‐ and Long‐Term Electoral Returns to Beneficial Policy
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/lsq.12218openalex-snapshot
Multilingual Sentiment Analysis: A New Approach to Measuring Conflict in Legislative Speeches
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122418759546openalex-snapshot
Mass Mobilization and the Durability of New Democracies
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168843openalex-snapshot
Measuring Emotion in Parliamentary Debates with Automated Textual Analysis
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.747openalex-snapshot
Unsupervised Cross-lingual Representation Learning at Scale
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2075901openalex-snapshot
Mea Culpa: A Sociology of Apology and Reconciliation.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/nqbhmopenalex-snapshot
Mass Mobilization and the Durability of New Democracies
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.63317/4fhqtpvii3vgopenalex-snapshot
XLM-T: Multilingual Language Models in Twitter for Sentiment Analysis and Beyond
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity
Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers
publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free
and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.