On the public citation graph
Discussion Paper in Search of the Author: The Surreal World of Academic Publishing
0 signed · 83 inferred · view as graph
Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.
Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the
claims that are yours.
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a
known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped
badge you can embed.
What this work says
Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.280.3.222openalex-snapshot
Prevalence of Articles With Honorary Authors and Ghost Authors in Peer-Reviewed Medical Journals
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.287.21.2769openalex-snapshot
Prevalence of Honorary and Ghost Authorship in Cochrane Reviews
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.295.1.90openalex-snapshot
The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-4571(199507)46:6<461::aid-asi5>3.0.co;2-gopenalex-snapshot
Improving the accuracy of institute for scientific information's journal impact factors
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/aris.2007.1440410110openalex-snapshot
Garfield and the impact factor
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20409openalex-snapshot
Comparative citation analysis of duplicate or highly related publications
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02511-3_1openalex-snapshot
The Journal Impact Factor: A Brief History, Critique, and Discussion of Adverse Effects
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02019306openalex-snapshot
Is citation analysis a legitimate evaluation tool?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s00005-008-0024-5openalex-snapshot
The top-ten in journal impact factor manipulation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1143-0openalex-snapshot
On the internal dynamics of the Shanghai ranking
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04427-1openalex-snapshot
Readability is decreasing in language and linguistics
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsisyn.2021.100208openalex-snapshot
Retraction of a peer reviewed article suggests ongoing problems with Australian forensic science
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2014.09.004openalex-snapshot
Unraveling scientific impact: Citation types in marketing journals
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2015.11.006openalex-snapshot
The museum of errors/horrors in Scopus
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2022.101252openalex-snapshot
The relationship between readability and scientific impact: Evidence from emerging technology discourses
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.09.001openalex-snapshot
Editors’ JIF-boosting stratagems – Which are appropriate and which not?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.10.025openalex-snapshot
Academic Misconduct, Misrepresentation and Gaming: A Reassessment
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2022.104608openalex-snapshot
Who games metrics and rankings? Institutional niches and journal impact factor inflation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2010.01.003openalex-snapshot
Counting footnotes: Citability in management studies
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9258(19)52451-6openalex-snapshot
PROTEIN MEASUREMENT WITH THE FOLIN PHENOL REAGENT
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(96)90865-xopenalex-snapshot
Signing up for authorship
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-03865-yopenalex-snapshot
Surge in number of ‘extremely productive’ authors concerns scientists
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-024-00887-yopenalex-snapshot
Journal editors are resigning en masse: what do these group exits achieve?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-024-02449-8openalex-snapshot
How to improve assessments of publication integrity
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-024-03960-8openalex-snapshot
Can AI-generated podcasts boost science engagement?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-025-01548-4openalex-snapshot
Are groundbreaking science discoveries becoming harder to find?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1042/cs20201573openalex-snapshot
How accurate are citations of frequently cited papers in biomedical literature?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2020.1756787openalex-snapshot
Civil disobedience in scientific authorship: Resistance and insubordination in science
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2023.2234819openalex-snapshot
The “Monsanto papers” and the nature of ghostwriting and related practices in contemporary peer review scientific literature
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2024.2349115openalex-snapshot
Rethinking the author name ambiguity problem and beyond: The case of the Chinese context
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.160384openalex-snapshot
The natural selection of bad science
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2020.0538openalex-snapshot
Quotation errors in general science journals
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1101/062109openalex-snapshot
A simple proposal for the publication of journal citation distributions
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1108/jd-06-2017-0092openalex-snapshot
“Let the community decide”? The vision and reality of soundness-only peer review in open-access mega-journals
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1108/oir-04-2018-0151openalex-snapshot
Publishing speed and acceptance rates of open access megajournals
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/ecin.12125openalex-snapshot
DO ABCs GET MORE CITATIONS THAN XYZs ?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6435.2009.00428.xopenalex-snapshot
Editorial Ruminations: Publishing Kyklos
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-8847.2012.00339.xopenalex-snapshot
Prevalence of Scientific Misconduct Among a Group of Researchers in N igeria
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1126/science.122.3159.108openalex-snapshot
Citation Indexes for Science
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1126/science.zcl2s6dopenalex-snapshot
Citation cartels help some mathematicians—and their universities—climb the rankings
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpcell.00208.2008openalex-snapshot
Authorship: why not just toss a coin?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00272openalex-snapshot
The oligopoly’s shift to open access: How the big five academic publishers profit from article processing charges
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/014107680710000313openalex-snapshot
Life and times of the impact factor: retrospective analysis of trends for seven medical journals (1994-2005) and their Editors' views
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0141076813511452openalex-snapshot
Fraud in scientific research – birth of the Concordat to uphold research integrity in the United Kingdom
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/016555158901500205openalex-snapshot
Possible inaccuracies occurring in citation analysis
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0539018421992204openalex-snapshot
Stop evaluating science: A historical-sociological argument
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016120980562openalex-snapshot
Publish or be ethical? Publishing pressure and scientific misconduct in research
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-6-42openalex-snapshot
The relationship between quality of research and citation frequency
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-015-0469-2openalex-snapshot
‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.27468.1openalex-snapshot
Current market rates for scholarly publishing services
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1287/inte.1070.0317openalex-snapshot
The Ombudsman: Verification of Citations: Fawlty Towers of Knowledge?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.13169/prometheus.40.4.0002openalex-snapshot
Health and medical researchers are willing to trade their results for journal impact factors: results from a discrete choice experiment
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1353/pbm.2007.0009openalex-snapshot
Ghost Marketing: Pharmaceutical Companies and Ghostwritten Journal Articles
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3003152openalex-snapshot
Explosion of formulaic research articles, including inappropriate study designs and false discoveries, based on the NHANES US national health database
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0040019openalex-snapshot
Ghost Authorship in Industry-Initiated Randomised Trials
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127502openalex-snapshot
The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159492openalex-snapshot
Misconduct, Marginality and Editorial Practices in Management, Business and Economics Journals
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0187394openalex-snapshot
Authorship and citation manipulation in academic research
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0223116openalex-snapshot
Scientific sinkhole: The pernicious price of formatting
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253397openalex-snapshot
The h-index is no longer an effective correlate of scientific reputation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0304342openalex-snapshot
Is something rotten in the state of Denmark? Cross-national evidence for widespread involvement but not systematic use of questionable research practices across all fields of research
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0328531openalex-snapshot
Features and signals in precocious citation impact: A meta-research study
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.15252/embr.201845731openalex-snapshot
Put science first and formatting later
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765201820170959openalex-snapshot
All publishers are predatory - some are bigger than others
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1590/s1807-59322010001000002openalex-snapshot
Bureaucrats, researchers, editors, and the impact factor - a vicious circle that is detrimental to science
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4888507openalex-snapshot
The Shadow of the Ring: How the Gollum Effect Impacts Research and Careers
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4923505openalex-snapshot
Collaboration in Medical Science and Innovation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.25088/complexsystems.14.3.269openalex-snapshot
Read Before You Cite!
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/rxv94_v1openalex-snapshot
Should we be wary of the role of scientific publishers in Open Science?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2023.jul.01openalex-snapshot
Multi-affiliation: a growing problem of scientific integrity
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.37349/ec.2024.00024openalex-snapshot
Who is the author: genuine, honorary, ghost, gold, and fake authors?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.37672/ukrio.2024.03.barrierstoinvestigatingreportingmisconductopenalex-snapshot
Barriers to Investigation and Reporting Research Misconduct
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1906.07011openalex-snapshot
Accuracy of citation data in Web of Science and Scopus
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2304.01393openalex-snapshot
Every Author as First Author
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5001/omj.2016.02openalex-snapshot
Research Misconduct: The Peril of Publish or Perish
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1042920openalex-snapshot
The Google Scholar Experiment: How To Index False Papers And Manipulate Bibliometric Indicators
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7057143openalex-snapshot
The Oligopoly's Shift to Open Access. How For-Profit Publishers Benefit from Article Processing Charges
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.53053/xvqc4423openalex-snapshot
At the credit crossroads: Modern neuroscience needs a cultural shift to adopt new authorship practices
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/11087.003.0018openalex-snapshot
Ike Antkare, His Publications, and Those of His Disciples
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity
Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers
publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free
and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.