On the public citation graph
Contesting fake news1
0 signed · 35 inferred · view as graph
Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.
Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the
claims that are yours.
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a
known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped
badge you can embed.
What this work says
Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1006/game.1998.0709openalex-snapshot
Difference-Form Contests and the Robustness of All-Pay Auctions
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00052067openalex-snapshot
The design of rent-seeking competitions
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10058-007-0031-6openalex-snapshot
Tullock and Hirshleifer: a meeting of the minds
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10058-015-0166-9openalex-snapshot
Accuracy in contests: players’ perspective
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-016-0024-4openalex-snapshot
Credence Goods, Misleading Labels, and Quality Differentiation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2017.05.012openalex-snapshot
Revenue ranking of optimally biased contests: The case of two players
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijindorg.2023.102920openalex-snapshot
The certifier for the long run
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbef.2020.100285openalex-snapshot
Credence goods in the literature: What the past fifteen years have taught us about fraud, incentives, and the role of institutions
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jet.2018.10.012openalex-snapshot
Communicating subjective evaluations
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s0176-2680(98)00027-5openalex-snapshot
Designing an optimal contest
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_2855-1openalex-snapshot
LIBOR: Origins, Economics, Crisis, Scandal and Reform
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1086/261010openalex-snapshot
Rank-Order Tournaments as Optimum Labor Contracts
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1086/466756openalex-snapshot
Free Competition and the Optimal Amount of Fraud
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/ajae/aau088openalex-snapshot
On the Economics of Labels: How Their Introduction Affects the Functioning of Markets and the Welfare of All Participants
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/ajae.12287openalex-snapshot
Market and welfare effects of quality misperception in food labels
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/iere.12598openalex-snapshot
EFFICIENT LIABILITY IN EXPERT MARKETS
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8276.2007.01024.xopenalex-snapshot
Credence Good Labeling: The Efficiency and Distributional Implications of Several Policy Approaches
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12555openalex-snapshot
The economics of standards: A literature review
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-resource-100516-053630openalex-snapshot
Certification Mechanisms for Credence Attributes of Foods: Does It Matter Who Provides Diagnosis?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1257/002205106776162717openalex-snapshot
On Doctors, Mechanics, and Computer Specialists: The Economics of Credence Goods
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.101.2.526openalex-snapshot
The Economics of Credence Goods: An Experiment on the Role of Liability, Verifiability, Reputation, and Competition
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.22.2.115openalex-snapshot
What the Seller Won't Tell You: Persuasion and Disclosure in Markets
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5046234openalex-snapshot
Party Politics: A Contest Perspective
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2202/1542-0485.1037openalex-snapshot
Economics of Private Labels: A Survey of Literature
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2202/1935-1704.1613openalex-snapshot
The Optimal Accuracy Level in Asymmetric Contests
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/1911749openalex-snapshot
Existence and Uniqueness of Equilibrium Points for Concave N-Person Games
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2555811openalex-snapshot
Strategic Choice of Quality When Quality is Costly: The Persistence of the High-Quality Advantage
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3982/ecta9869openalex-snapshot
Aggregating the Single Crossing Property
What points at this work
Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1108/bfj-02-2026-0259openalex-snapshot
Regulatory gaps in high-value food markets: a comparative analysis of truffle policies
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity
Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers
publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free
and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.