On the public citation graph
Awareness of Endangered Species Conservation as a Key Factor Influencing PES Participation
0 signed · 49 inferred · view as graph
Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.
Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the
claims that are yours.
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a
known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped
badge you can embed.
What this work says
Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-021-01546-6openalex-snapshot
Social actors’ perceptions of wildlife: Insights for the conservation of species in Mediterranean protected areas
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2015.05.006openalex-snapshot
Effects of an agri-environment scheme on bumblebee reproduction at local and landscape scales
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2016.11.035openalex-snapshot
Human preferences for species conservation: Animal charisma trumps endangered status
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.03.011openalex-snapshot
Designing payments for environmental services in theory and practice: An overview of the issues
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.006openalex-snapshot
Reconciling theory and practice: An alternative conceptual framework for understanding payments for environmental services
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.08.016openalex-snapshot
Revisiting the concept of payments for environmental services
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.10.012openalex-snapshot
Towards a power-sensitive and socially-informed analysis of payments for ecosystem services (PES): Addressing the gaps in the current debate
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2022.107652openalex-snapshot
Temporary PES do not crowd out and may crowd in lab-in-the-field forest conservation in Colombia
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.09.007openalex-snapshot
Multi-classification of payments for ecosystem services: How do classification characteristics relate to overall PES success?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.11.002openalex-snapshot
Challenges in ecosystem services governance: Multi-levels, multi-actors, multi-rationalities
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.11.013openalex-snapshot
Indigenous communities’ perception regarding payments for environmental services programme in Oaxaca Mexico
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.12.007openalex-snapshot
Analysing the impacts of PES programmes beyond economic rationale: Perceptions of ecosystem services provision associated to the Mexican case
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101159openalex-snapshot
Participation in payments for ecosystem services programs in the Global South: A systematic review
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2015.06.002openalex-snapshot
What drives farmers’ participation in EU agri-environmental schemes?: Results from a qualitative meta-analysis
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2021.101912openalex-snapshot
Factors influencing farmers’ satisfaction with the quality of agricultural extension services
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2013.04.004openalex-snapshot
Scope for introducing payments for ecosystem services as a strategy to reduce deforestation in the Kilombero wetlands catchment area
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.07.003openalex-snapshot
Measuring effectiveness, efficiency and equity in an experimental Payments for Ecosystem Services trial
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.10.013openalex-snapshot
Payments for Ecosystem Services (PES) in the face of external biophysical stressors
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121211openalex-snapshot
Farmers’ willingness-to-pay for eco-friendly agricultural waste management in Ethiopia: A contingent valuation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110243openalex-snapshot
Participation in agri-environmental schemes: A contingent valuation study of farmers in Ireland
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2021.125974openalex-snapshot
Corridors as a tool for linking habitats – Shortcomings and perspectives for plant conservation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2024.103438openalex-snapshot
Farmers’ limited perceptions of the role of ecological processes in crop production, a potential obstacle to agroecological transition
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.05.032openalex-snapshot
Rethinking biodiversity governance in European agricultural landscapes: Acceptability of alternative governance scenarios
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104358openalex-snapshot
The legitimacy of result-oriented and action-oriented agri-environmental schemes: A comparison of farmers’ and citizens’ perceptions
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oor.2024.100662openalex-snapshot
How to choose a sampling technique and determine sample size for research: A simplified guide for researchers
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tfp.2024.100766openalex-snapshot
Farmers’ knowledge, attitude, and motivation for adoption of climate-smart agroforestry in two contrasting agroecosystems of Rwanda
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2011.06.011openalex-snapshot
Restoration of ecosystem services and biodiversity: conflicts and opportunities
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/s003060531300063xopenalex-snapshot
Is the clouded leopard Neofelis nebulosa extinct in Taiwan, and could it be reintroduced? An assessment of prey and habitat
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/s0030605315000538openalex-snapshot
Do social values influence levels of conservation effort in threatened species? The case of two Australian chats
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/536143aopenalex-snapshot
Biodiversity: The ravages of guns, nets and bulldozers
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01014openalex-snapshot
Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-09646-4openalex-snapshot
The future of Southeast Asia’s forests
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-018-0036-xopenalex-snapshot
From principles to practice in paying for nature’s services
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2018.1463420openalex-snapshot
Decentralizing Payments for Hydrological Services Programs in Veracruz, Mexico: Challenges and Implications for Long-term Sustainability
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2010.490058openalex-snapshot
Does intensity of change matter? Factors affecting adoption of agri-environmental schemes in Spain
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2017.1327424openalex-snapshot
A model integrating social-cultural concepts of nature into frameworks of interaction between social and natural systems
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/78.3.691openalex-snapshot
A Note on a General Definition of the Coefficient of Determination
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biac008openalex-snapshot
Integrating Social Justice into Higher Education Conservation Science
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biu146openalex-snapshot
Social Equity Matters in Payments for Ecosystem Services
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12734openalex-snapshot
Conservation practitioners' perspectives on decision triggers for evidence‐based management
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12095openalex-snapshot
Payments for ecosystem services in developing world fisheries
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aao6652openalex-snapshot
Revealing pathways from payments for ecosystem services to socioeconomic outcomes
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-resource-100518-094206openalex-snapshot
Payments for Environmental Services: Past Performance and Pending Potentials
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133311421708openalex-snapshot
Economic valuation and the commodification of ecosystem services
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1186/cc3045openalex-snapshot
Statistics review 14: Logistic regression.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0293083openalex-snapshot
A multi-taxon analysis of European Red Lists reveals major threats to biodiversity
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1505/146554824839071607openalex-snapshot
Balancing conservation and development: a review of navigating Malaysian forest policies and initiatives
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2011-4515openalex-snapshot
Technical note: The risk ratio, an alternative to the odds ratio for estimating the association between multiple risk factors and a dichotomous outcome
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3390/environments11070137openalex-snapshot
Ecotoxicity of Pesticides Approved for Use in European Conventional or Organic Agriculture for Honeybees, Birds, and Earthworms
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity
Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers
publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free
and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.