On the public citation graph
Reconsidering the Double Dividend of Sufficiency: Individual Utility or Collective Flourishing?
0 signed · 48 inferred · view as graph
Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.
Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the
claims that are yours.
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a
known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped
badge you can embed.
What this work says
Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-005-6032-4openalex-snapshot
Experienced Utility as a Standard of Policy Evaluation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-019-00146-2openalex-snapshot
Being Well Together: Individual Subjective and Community Wellbeing
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-024-02027-2openalex-snapshot
When enough is enough: Introducing sufficiency corridors to put techno-economism in its place
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s41060-020-00224-2openalex-snapshot
Measuring objective and subjective well-being: dimensions and data sources
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.03.021openalex-snapshot
Linking individuals' ecological footprint to their subjective well-being
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.05.019openalex-snapshot
A Framework for Decoupling Human Need Satisfaction From Energy Use
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.09.016openalex-snapshot
Can We Consume Less and Gain More? Environmental Efficiency of Well-being at the Individual Level
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.03.021openalex-snapshot
Achieving triple dividend through mindfulness: More sustainable consumption, less unsustainable consumption and more life satisfaction
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106448openalex-snapshot
Does it have to be a sacrifice? Different notions of the good life, pro-environmental behavior and their heterogeneous impact on well-being
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106736openalex-snapshot
Is There Hope for the Double Dividend? How Social Context Can Shape Synergies and Tradeoffs between Sustainable Consumption and Well-Being
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108383openalex-snapshot
A comparative review of de- and post-growth modeling studies
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108684openalex-snapshot
Pro-environmental behavior and life satisfaction: How strong is our evidence?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.03.013openalex-snapshot
Sufficiency and consumer behaviour: From theory to policy
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2018.09.002openalex-snapshot
Challenges for the degrowth transition: The debate about wellbeing
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.01.014openalex-snapshot
Crisis or opportunity? Economic degrowth for social equity and ecological sustainability. Introduction to this special issue
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2003.10.009openalex-snapshot
Why isn’t growth making us happier? Utility on the hedonic treadmill
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2014.03.007openalex-snapshot
Damned if they do, damned if they don’t: Material buyers are not happier from material or experiential consumption
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2005.11.040openalex-snapshot
Why does income growth fail to make us happier?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s2542-5196(24)00147-5openalex-snapshot
Beyond GDP: a review and conceptual framework for measuring sustainable and inclusive wellbeing
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s2542-5196(24)00310-3openalex-snapshot
Post-growth: the science of wellbeing within planetary boundaries
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1006859511756openalex-snapshot
MEASURING QUALITY OF LIFE: ECONOMIC, SOCIAL, AND SUBJECTIVE INDICATORS
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.55.1.56openalex-snapshot
The funds, friends, and faith of happy people.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.106.4.766openalex-snapshot
Is there a universal need for positive self-regard?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037409openalex-snapshot
The relationship between materialism and personal well-being: A meta-analysis.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-022-04412-xopenalex-snapshot
Degrowth can work — here’s how science can help
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-16941-yopenalex-snapshot
Scientists’ warning on affluence
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1907351118openalex-snapshot
Years of good life is a well-being indicator designed to serve research on sustainability
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/00346760500130309openalex-snapshot
Subjective and Objective Well-Being in Relation to Economic Inputs: Puzzles and Responses
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/09535314.2023.2301443openalex-snapshot
Downscaling down under: towards degrowth in integrated assessment models
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/13549830802475625openalex-snapshot
Where is the “wellbeing dividend”? Nature, structure and consumption inequalities
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2020.1812222openalex-snapshot
What does degrowth mean? A few points of clarification
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2021.1991450openalex-snapshot
Minimalism, voluntary simplicity, and well-being: A systematic review of the empirical literature
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195073461.001.0001openalex-snapshot
The Joyless Economy
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/owc/9780199552580.001.0001openalex-snapshot
The Theory of the Leisure Class
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12316openalex-snapshot
Optimal human functioning around the world: A new index of eudaimonic well‐being in 166 nations
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145056openalex-snapshot
Personality, Culture, and Subjective Well-Being: Emotional and Cognitive Evaluations of Life
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1162/1088198054084734openalex-snapshot
Live Better by Consuming Less?: Is There a “Double Dividend” in Sustainable Consumption?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.46.1.95openalex-snapshot
Relative Income, Happiness, and Utility: An Explanation for the Easterlin Paradox and Other Puzzles
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163345openalex-snapshot
Subjective Wellbeing, Objective Wellbeing and Inequality in Australia
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1596/0-8018-5254-4openalex-snapshot
The analysis of household surveys
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031033openalex-snapshot
Partial Correlation Analysis of Association between Subjective Well-Being and Ecological Footprint
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3390/su5041372openalex-snapshot
Explaining the Paradox: How Pro-Environmental Behaviour can both Thwart and Foster Well-Being
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351231879-1openalex-snapshot
Subjective Well-Being and Life Satisfaction
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity
Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers
publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free
and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.