On the public citation graph

Carbon Emissions Trading System, Financial Innovation, and Corporate Green Investment Decisions: A Quasi-Natural Experiment

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5916332
0 signed · 14 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.
Claim with ORCID
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.
See reference health

What this work says

Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3284openalex-snapshot
Carbon emissions trading and corporate green investment: The perspective of external pressure and internal incentive
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.4103openalex-snapshot
Will China's Carbon Emission Trading Regulation Really Decrease the Green Investment of Firms? A Microperspective on Corporate Governance
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-021-04098-wopenalex-snapshot
Financing and coordination strategies for a manufacturer with limited operating and green innovation capital: bank credit financing versus supplier green investment
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2024.118295openalex-snapshot
Effects of carbon emission trading system on corporate green total factor productivity: Does environmental regulation play a role of green blessing?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2024.101420openalex-snapshot
How can carbon trading promote the green innovation efficiency of manufacturing enterprises?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2024.105251openalex-snapshot
Can the environmental trading enhance corporate green innovation efficiency?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2025.104138openalex-snapshot
Can corporate site visits by institutional investors improve the quality of corporate environmental information disclosure? Evidence from China
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2024.2443464openalex-snapshot
The impact of emissions trading systems on technological innovation for climate change mitigation: a systematic review
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1108/cfri-06-2023-0143openalex-snapshot
Unveiling the digital desire: UTAUT analysis of NFT investment intentions in Malaysia
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1108/cfri-08-2022-0158openalex-snapshot
The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on bank systemic risk: some cross-country evidence
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1109/tem.2022.3186905openalex-snapshot
Does Carbon Trading Lead to Green Technology Innovation: Recent Evidence From Chinese Companies in Resource-Based Industries
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0958305x211015327openalex-snapshot
Does a carbon emissions trading scheme spur urban green innovation? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2021.759572openalex-snapshot
Can Emission Trading Scheme Improve Carbon Emission Performance? Evidence From China
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.984612openalex-snapshot
Carbon emissions trading policy and green transformation of China’s manufacturing industry: Mechanism assessment and policy implications
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.