On the public citation graph
Empirical Precision and Theoretical Depth across the Sciences
0 signed · 40 inferred · view as graph
Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.
Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the
claims that are yours.
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a
known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped
badge you can embed.
What this work says
Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0494-7openalex-snapshot
Negative results are disappearing from most disciplines and countries
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.12.004openalex-snapshot
A scalable and adaptive method for finding semantically equivalent cue words of uncertainty
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2020.110211openalex-snapshot
Time to get personal? The impact of researchers choices on the selection of treatment targets using the experience sampling methodology
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2021.02.003openalex-snapshot
Same data, different conclusions: Radical dispersion in empirical results when independent analysts operationalize and test the same hypothesis
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.05.002openalex-snapshot
Scientific misbehavior in economics
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2026.105451openalex-snapshot
Rethinking scientific progress in the social sciences: disruptive or cumulative?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s0376-6357(01)00156-5openalex-snapshot
Graph use in psychology and other sciences
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511498596openalex-snapshot
Philosophy of Experimental Biology
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511621123openalex-snapshot
The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511814563openalex-snapshot
Representing and Intervening
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139171434.011openalex-snapshot
Reflections on my Critics
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.8.1.59openalex-snapshot
Psychology's Status as a Scientific Discipline: Its Empirical Placement within an Implicit Hierarchy of the Sciences
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0912-zopenalex-snapshot
Specification curve analysis
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2314-9openalex-snapshot
Variability in the analysis of a single neuroimaging dataset by many teams
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05543-xopenalex-snapshot
Papers and patents are becoming less disruptive over time
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2203150119openalex-snapshot
Observing many researchers using the same data and hypothesis reveals a hidden universe of uncertainty
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2403490121openalex-snapshot
Heterogeneity in effect size estimates
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1086/349468openalex-snapshot
The Function of Measurement in Modern Physical Science
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1086/703555openalex-snapshot
A New Account of Replication in the Experimental Life Sciences
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/ecin.12992openalex-snapshot
The influence of hidden researcher decisions in applied microeconomics
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/030631200030001003openalex-snapshot
Scientific Graphs and the Hierarchy of the Sciences:
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611430953openalex-snapshot
Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245917747646openalex-snapshot
Many Analysts, One Data Set: Making Transparent How Variations in Analytic Choices Affect Results
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919869583openalex-snapshot
Assessing Theoretical Conclusions With Blinded Inference to Investigate a Potential Inference Crisis
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010068openalex-snapshot
“Positive” Results Increase Down the Hierarchy of the Sciences
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0066938openalex-snapshot
Bibliometric Evidence for a Hierarchy of the Sciences
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.15195/v3.a32openalex-snapshot
Measuring Paradigmaticness of Disciplines Using Text
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5840/jphil1988851016openalex-snapshot
On the Stability of the Laboratory Sciences
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226217239.001.0001openalex-snapshot
The Essential Tension
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226292038.001.0001openalex-snapshot
Explaining Science
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226511993.001.0001openalex-snapshot
Error and the Growth of Experimental Knowledge
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity
Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers
publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free
and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.