On the public citation graph
The Laplace Innovation for RiskMetricsTM: Evidence from Extensive Value-at-Risk and Expected Shortfall Backtests for Banks
0 signed · 27 inferred · view as graph
Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.
Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the
claims that are yours.
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a
known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped
badge you can embed.
What this work says
Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119205869openalex-snapshot
Financial Risk Forecasting: The Theory and Practice of Forecasting Market Risk with Implementation in R and Matlab
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-78657-3openalex-snapshot
Financial Risk Management with Bayesian Estimation of GARCH Models: Theory and Applications
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s00180-016-0646-6openalex-snapshot
Comparison of Value-at-Risk models using the MCS approach
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-021-00985-2openalex-snapshot
Accrual mispricing, value-at-risk, and expected stock returns
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2010.06.018openalex-snapshot
Bayesian Value-at-Risk and expected shortfall forecasting via the asymmetric Laplace distribution
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2013.09.022openalex-snapshot
EGARCH models with fat tails, skewness and leverage
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2017.04.004openalex-snapshot
Volatility measures and Value-at-Risk
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2018.05.004openalex-snapshot
Forecasting risk with Markov-switching GARCH models:A large-scale performance study
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2009.03.006openalex-snapshot
Are RiskMetrics forecasts good enough? Evidence from 31 stock markets
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2014.07.005openalex-snapshot
A new set of improved Value-at-Risk backtests
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-4266(02)00283-2openalex-snapshot
On the coherence of expected shortfall
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139540933openalex-snapshot
Dynamic Models for Volatility and Heavy Tails
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1057/s41261-022-00199-zopenalex-snapshot
Decoupling VaR and regulatory capital: an examination of practitioners’ experience of market risk regulation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1057/s41283-022-00100-2openalex-snapshot
Oil tail-risk forecasts: from financial crisis to COVID-19
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/14697688.2014.946955openalex-snapshot
On elicitable risk measures
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/jjfinec/nbaa013openalex-snapshot
Regression-Based Expected Shortfall Backtesting
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/jjfinec/nbaa029openalex-snapshot
Regulatory Capital and Incentives for Risk Model Choice under Basel 3
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/jjfinec/nbab008openalex-snapshot
Backtesting Value-at-Risk and Expected Shortfall in the Presence of Estimation Error
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/jjfinec/nbq025openalex-snapshot
Backtesting Value-at-Risk: A GMM Duration-Based Test
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0312896214557837openalex-snapshot
An evaluation of the effectiveness of Value-at-Risk (VaR) models for Australian banks under Basel III
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1198/jasa.2011.r10138openalex-snapshot
Making and Evaluating Point Forecasts
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1214/16-aos1439openalex-snapshot
Higher order elicitability and Osband’s principle
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1257/0002828041464597openalex-snapshot
Risk and Volatility: Econometric Models and Financial Practice
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.21314/jor.2015.318openalex-snapshot
What is the best risk measure in practice? A comparison of standard measures
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3905/jod.1995.407942openalex-snapshot
Techniques for Verifying the Accuracy of Risk Measurement Models
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity
Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers
publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free
and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.