On the public citation graph
Efficiency and Equity in an Experimental Repeated Entry Game
0 signed · 45 inferred · view as graph
Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.
Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the
claims that are yours.
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a
known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped
badge you can embed.
What this work says
Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1995.1100openalex-snapshot
Coordination in Market Entry Games with Symmetric Players
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-41533-7_6openalex-snapshot
Equilibrium Point Selection in a Class of Market Entry Games
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-010-0544-zopenalex-snapshot
Endogenous entry in contests
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-009-0434-0openalex-snapshot
Can groups solve the problem of over-bidding in contests?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-014-9421-0openalex-snapshot
A survey of experimental research on contests, all-pay auctions and tournaments
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-021-09703-0openalex-snapshot
Indefinitely repeated contests: An experimental study
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2013.02.001openalex-snapshot
On the importance of behavioral operational research: The case of understanding and communicating about dynamic systems
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.09.027openalex-snapshot
Experimental behavioural research in operational research: What we know and what we might come to know
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2020.11.031openalex-snapshot
Taking stock of behavioural OR: A review of behavioural studies with an intervention focus
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2023.01.020openalex-snapshot
Platform responses to entry in a local market with mobile providers
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2024.09.038openalex-snapshot
Optimal platform pricing with multi-sided users: A direct and indirect network approach
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2024.10.044openalex-snapshot
Tournament design: A review from an operational research perspective
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2026.03.004openalex-snapshot
Coordinating incentives and curb capacity in a food delivery platform
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2019.07.001openalex-snapshot
Entry in contests with incomplete information: Theory and experiments
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2004.04.007openalex-snapshot
Learning, information, and sorting in market entry games: theory and evidence
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2006.03.014openalex-snapshot
Equilibrium learning in simple contests
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2014.05.004openalex-snapshot
Overbidding and Overspreading in Rent-Seeking Experiments: Cost Structure and Prize Allocation Rules
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2023.10.008openalex-snapshot
The infinitely repeated volunteer's dilemma: An experimental study
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijindorg.2009.11.003openalex-snapshot
Endogenous communication and tacit coordination in market entry games
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbef.2015.12.001openalex-snapshot
oTree - An Open-Source Platform for Laboratory, Online, and Field Experiments
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2004.09.013openalex-snapshot
All-pay auctions—an experimental study
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2006.05.018openalex-snapshot
Excess entry in an experimental winner-take-all market
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2006.06.005openalex-snapshot
Endogenous entry and self-selection in private value auctions: An experimental study
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2018.01.023openalex-snapshot
Winner-take-all and proportional-prize contests: Theory and experimental results
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2010.05.006openalex-snapshot
Entry into winner-take-all and proportional-prize contests: An experimental study
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2011.05.005openalex-snapshot
The impact of research grant funding on scientific productivity
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s0014-2921(00)00044-1openalex-snapshot
Bidding behavior in a repeated procurement auction: A summary
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1020892405622openalex-snapshot
Tacit Coordination in a Decentralized Market Entry Game with Fixed Capacity
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1719557115openalex-snapshot
The Matthew effect in science funding
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/ej/uez040openalex-snapshot
Does Success Breed Success? a Quasi-Experiment on Strategic Momentum in Dynamic Contests
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdaa081openalex-snapshot
The Gender Earnings Gap in the Gig Economy: Evidence from over a Million Rideshare Drivers
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/1756-2171.12433openalex-snapshot
The Matthew effect, research productivity, and the dynamic allocation of NIH grants
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1126/science.159.3810.56openalex-snapshot
The Matthew Effect in Science
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.89.1.306openalex-snapshot
Overconfidence and Excess Entry: An Experimental Approach
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2019.0896openalex-snapshot
Unemployment and Worker Participation in the Gig Economy: Evidence from an Online Labor Market
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2017.2955openalex-snapshot
Sourcing Innovation: On Feedback in Contests
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2019.3488openalex-snapshot
Information Disclosure in Contests With Endogenous Entry: An Experiment
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2021.4111openalex-snapshot
The Role of Participation in Innovation Contests
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.44.1.119openalex-snapshot
Equilibrium Play in Large Group Market Entry Games
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2019.0803openalex-snapshot
Operations Management in the Age of the Sharing Economy: What Is Old and What Is New?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.2016.1575openalex-snapshot
Optimal Award Scheme in Innovation Tournaments
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183967openalex-snapshot
How much would each researcher receive if competitive government research funding were distributed equally among researchers?
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity
Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers
publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free
and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.