On the public citation graph

Rejected: Career concerns in the refereeing process

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6361071
0 signed · 29 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.
Claim with ORCID
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.
See reference health

What this work says

Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01553188openalex-snapshot
Patterns of evaluation in science: Institutionalisation, structure and functions of the referee system
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2010.01.032openalex-snapshot
Do journals accept too many papers?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2020.07.008openalex-snapshot
Reputation and news suppression in the media industry
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2012.01.012openalex-snapshot
Market Power and Reputational Concerns in the Ratings Industry
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2008.10.002openalex-snapshot
The inside scoop: Acceptance and rejection at the journal of international economics
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s0014-2921(03)00019-9openalex-snapshot
Anti-herding and strategic consultation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s0899-8256(02)00531-6openalex-snapshot
Hiding information in electoral competition
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1086/341868openalex-snapshot
The Slowdown of the Economics Publishing Process
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1086/499414openalex-snapshot
Media Bias and Reputation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjz035openalex-snapshot
Are Referees and Editors in Economics Gender Neutral?*
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhu029openalex-snapshot
Referee Recommendations
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhu093openalex-snapshot
Editorial: Cosmetic Surgery in the Academic Review Process
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-937x.00083openalex-snapshot
Managerial Incentive Problems: A Dynamic Perspective
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/caje.12352openalex-snapshot
On publication, refereeing and working hard
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-2171.2006.tb00010.xopenalex-snapshot
Reputational cheap talk
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12497openalex-snapshot
Concentration of power at the editorial boards of economics journals
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12060openalex-snapshot
Gender in Academic Networking: The Role of Gatekeepers in Professorial Recruitment
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_00839openalex-snapshot
What Do Editors Maximize? Evidence from Four Economics Journals
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.97.1.150openalex-snapshot
Decision Making in Committees: Transparency, Reputation, and Voting Rules
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.99.3.572openalex-snapshot
Bureaucratic Minimal Squawk Behavior: Theory and Evidence from Regulatory Agencies
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.20221653openalex-snapshot
Publishing Economics: How Slow? Why Slow? Is Slow Productive? How to Fix Slow?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.51.1.144openalex-snapshot
Nine Facts about Top Journals in Economics
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.28.3.169openalex-snapshot
What Policies Increase Prosocial Behavior? An Experiment with Referees at the Journal of Public Economics
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.31.1.231openalex-snapshot
How to Write an Effective Referee Report and Improve the Scientific Review Process
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.8.1.165openalex-snapshot
How Are the Mighty Fallen: Rejected Classic Articles by Leading Economists
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/1882010openalex-snapshot
Job Market Signaling
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2095739openalex-snapshot
Scholarly Consensus and Journal Rejection Rates
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2669237openalex-snapshot
Leadership and Pandering: A Theory of Executive Policymaking
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2696413openalex-snapshot
Managerial Career Concerns and Investments in Information
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.