On the public citation graph
The Politics of Eligibility: Negotiating the Boundaries of Carbon Dioxide Removal under the Paris Agreement
0 signed · 17 inferred · view as graph
Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.
Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the
claims that are yours.
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a
known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped
badge you can embed.
What this work says
Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.671openalex-snapshot
Negative emissions and the long history of carbon removal
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.70024openalex-snapshot
Lessons for Nature‐Based Carbon Removal: Learning From the Politics of Environmental Conservation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.729openalex-snapshot
Framing “nature‐based” solutions to climate change
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.826openalex-snapshot
Is carbon removal delaying emission reductions?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-004-0080-6openalex-snapshot
Bridging Political Expectations and Scientific Limitations in Climate Risk Management ? On the Uncertain Effects of International Carbon Sink Policies*
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-025-01060-3openalex-snapshot
Pigou’s Advice and Sisyphus’ Warning: Carbon Pricing with Non-Permanent Carbon Dioxide Removal
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esg.2024.100202openalex-snapshot
Two problems or one? Climate engineering and conceptual disaggregation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2022.102550openalex-snapshot
The policy discourse on negative emissions, land-based technologies, and the Global South
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-025-02517-5openalex-snapshot
UNFCCC carbon trading could undermine global climate action
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2017.1323579openalex-snapshot
The democratic legitimacy of orchestration: the UNFCCC, non-state actors, and transnational climate governance
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiaf061openalex-snapshot
Boundary work and the (un)making of global cooperation: mapping the terrain
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/isagsq/ksad070openalex-snapshot
Communities of Practice in World Politics: Advancing a Research Agenda
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/isagsq/ksad077openalex-snapshot
An Emergent Community of Cyber Sovereignty: The Reproduction of Boundaries?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1162/glep_a_00489openalex-snapshot
Pursuing an Indigenous Platform: Exploring Opportunities and Constraints for Indigenous Participation in the UNFCCC
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2095325openalex-snapshot
Boundary-Work and the Demarcation of Science from Non-Science: Strains and Interests in Professional Ideologies of Scientists
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446282243.n11openalex-snapshot
Grounded Theory and Theoretical Coding
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity
Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers
publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free
and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.