On the public citation graph

Harnessing Momentum in Dynamic Contests

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6869653
0 signed · 31 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.
Claim with ORCID
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.
See reference health

What this work says

Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-011-0657-zopenalex-snapshot
Effort maximization in asymmetric contest games with heterogeneous contestants
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2010.01.013openalex-snapshot
Information feedback in a dynamic tournament
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2016.02.003openalex-snapshot
Biased contests for symmetric players
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2018.05.005openalex-snapshot
Keep on fighting: The dynamics of head starts in all-pay auctions
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2022.07.005openalex-snapshot
Biasing dynamic contests between ex-ante symmetric players
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2024.04.006openalex-snapshot
Winner's effort in multi-battle team contests
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijindorg.2012.09.002openalex-snapshot
Endogenous strength in conflicts
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2005.08.009openalex-snapshot
Primaries and the New Hampshire Effect
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2010.09.012openalex-snapshot
Political culture and discrimination in contests
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2011.01.009openalex-snapshot
Double-edged transparency in teams
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2011.07.002openalex-snapshot
Incumbency advantage and political campaign spending limits
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2018.03.003openalex-snapshot
How to split the pie: Optimal rewards in dynamic multi-battle competitions
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/s0025557200179628openalex-snapshot
Counting zeros of generalised polynomials: Descartes’ rule of signs and Laguerre’s extensions
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1086/656669openalex-snapshot
Interim Performance Feedback in Multistage Tournaments: The Optimality of Partial Disclosure
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1086/693040openalex-snapshot
Contests for Experimentation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1086/705670openalex-snapshot
Turning Up the Heat: The Discouraging Effect of Competition in Contests
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1086/711762openalex-snapshot
Dynamic Tournament Design: Evidence from Prediction Contests
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/ej/ueaf005openalex-snapshot
Fighting for Lemons: The Balancing Effect of Private Information on Incentives in Dynamic Contests
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/ej/uez040openalex-snapshot
Does Success Breed Success? a Quasi-Experiment on Strategic Momentum in Dynamic Contests
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdac074openalex-snapshot
Optimal Feedback in Contests
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdae001openalex-snapshot
Voluntary Disclosure in Asymmetric Contests
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/ecoj.12277openalex-snapshot
Information Disclosure in Contests: A Bayesian Persuasion Approach
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9779.2009.01431.xopenalex-snapshot
Tournaments of Weakly Heterogeneous Players
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2354.2012.00720.xopenalex-snapshot
PEER TRANSPARENCY IN TEAMS: DOES IT HELP OR HINDER INCENTIVES?*
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-2171.2010.00109.xopenalex-snapshot
Transparency and incentives among peers
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_00021openalex-snapshot
Testing Contest Theory: Evidence from Best-of-Three Tennis Matches
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2297442openalex-snapshot
Racing with Uncertainty
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3982/qe1679openalex-snapshot
How success breeds success
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3982/te4259openalex-snapshot
Optimal contests with incomplete information and convex effort costs
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3982/te5367openalex-snapshot
Contests with sequential entry and incomplete information
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3982/te5536openalex-snapshot
Optimal sequential contests
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.